Field Gulls on Kenneth Walker III

ArticleSeahawks-Commanders review: A win in horseshoes, but that’s not what they were...
Read the full article

From the article

It's okay to recognize they miss Walker, they would've won in Week 3 with him, and still shouldn't have paid him what the Chiefs did... But the Seahawks missed him, undeniably, for the second time in three games.
Captured by STACKED 10 hr after posting

STACKED’s take

Positive signalRole

Walker's absence cost Seahawks Week 3 win; would've solved rushing woes.

The source explicitly states the Seahawks 'miss Walker, they would've won in Week 3 with him' despite acknowledging he shouldn't have been paid what the Chiefs gave him; Walker's absence is cited as a key factor in Seattle's ineffective rushing attack (44 total yards, under two yards per carry), and the source notes this is the second time in three games his absence has been felt.

Kenneth Walker III headshotKenneth Walker IIIRB · KCPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight

More on Kenneth Walker III and from Field Gulls