Source + player page
Reddit /r/fantasyfootball fantasy football takes on Mark Andrews
Every source-backed reddit insight STACKED has extracted from Reddit /r/fantasyfootball about Mark Andrews.
12
Insights
12
Positive
0
Negative
Insight ledger
All Reddit /r/fantasyfootball insights about Mark Andrews
PositiveProjectionSep 14, 2026
Finished as TE15 in Week 1, only significantly outperformed by McBride, Kincaid, Likely, and Goedert. One comment uses him as evidence that early TE picks (TE3-9 by ADP) underperformed: 'This week validated the stance that unless you were grabbing McBride or Bowers (before he went down) there was absolutely no reason to grab a TE early. Mark Andrews was the TE15.'PositiveRoleSep 14, 2026
With Flowers sidelined, Mark Andrews becomes focal point of Ravens passing game. One comment suggests 'Looks like this is the year to own Mandrews' and another references 'Jacobi and Andrews come on down.' Potential beneficiary of Flowers' absence.PositiveValueSep 13, 2026
Mentioned as historical TE benchmark (RB1 numbers in peak years, late 1st/2nd round value). Community notes current TE landscape lacks a truly bankable elite like Andrews was. One comment: 'Now second guessing starting Andrews' (vs. Johnson). No specific 2025 stats or role changes mentioned.PositiveValueSep 11, 2026
One manager mentions starting Mayer over Andrews, but no substantive discussion of Andrews' Week 1 outlook or impact from Bowers' injury.PositiveRoleAug 31, 2026
One comment suggests Flowers could replace Andrews as Lamar's big end zone target going forward; another notes Andrews is still on team. Minimal substantive discussion of Andrews' role.PositiveProjectionAug 23, 2026
OP uses Andrews as TE12 baseline (156 – 18.5 = 137.5 projected points) to compare Aubrey's value gap vs. other positions.PositiveRoleAug 21, 2026
Ravens TE; Bateman arrest has zero fantasy impact on Andrews. Multiple comments explicitly state Andrews unaffected ('Andrews is spent,' 'entirely different roles with entirely different skillsets,' 'absence of Bateman would not effect him in any way'). One comment notes Andrews 'been washed for 2 years and always unreliable in clutch moments.' Flowers is Ravens' only reliable receiver; Andrews aging/unreliable per community.PositiveValueAug 21, 2026
Mentioned once as alternative backup TE option alongside Goedert, Likely, Johnson, Okonkwo for early-season coverage while Kittle recovers.PositiveProjectionAug 16, 2026
Community debate over whether Mark Andrews was 'in his prime' last year when Likely was his backup. One comment argues Andrews took a step back last year (Lamar injured, team played poorly), while another defends Andrews' historical prime years. Relevant because Likely's TE15 finish as Andrews' backup is cited as evidence he cannot be a top-tier TE. However, the debate suggests Andrews' decline last year may have artificially suppressed Likely's opportunity.PositiveRoleAug 13, 2026
Andrews is a red-zone receiving target ahead of Flowers in pecking order. With Likely and Hopkins gone, Andrews may see increased red-zone volume, further limiting Flowers' TD opportunities. Some community members note Andrews is aging and less reliable, but still a factor in red-zone allocation.PositiveDepth ChartJul 16, 2026
Ravens TE competing with Rashod Bateman for targets. Bateman positioned as WR3 behind Flowers and Andrews.PositiveProjectionJul 15, 2026
Post mentions Andrews in passing: 'don't sleep on him' in context of expected Ravens pass-attempt increase. No substantive community discussion or sentiment captured.