From the episode

I'd rather have Stafford just because he has two years and he's, you know, more viable fantasy-wise than Aaron Rodgers is. But if it's a second-round pick for Stafford versus a fourth-round pick for Aaron Rodgers, give me A-Rod.

STACKED’s take

NeutralProjection

Stafford preferred over Rodgers for QB2 depth, but cost-dependent; durability concerns linger.

Bogman prefers Stafford over Aaron Rodgers for a QB2 in super flex because Stafford has two years of viability remaining, but the preference flips if the cost differential is significant (e.g., second-round pick for Stafford versus fourth-round for Rodgers); in that case, the cheaper asset makes more sense. However, there are concerns about Stafford's durability given serious back questions a year ago and the Rams' sub-.500 record this year, raising the possibility this could be his last year if the team falls short of expectations.

Matthew Stafford headshotMatthew StaffordQB · LARPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight