From the video

for Pat Freiermuth, that has not been as good for him from a target per route run perspective. It's a 37% target per route run decrease
Mentioned at 28:48 – 29:29Captured by STACKED 13 hr after posting
STACKED’s take
Positive signalMatchup
37% target per route run decrease vs. cover three
Freiermuth shows a 37% decrease in target per route run against cover three compared to other coverages, indicating a significant efficiency disadvantage in that shell.
Pat FreiermuthTE · PITPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insightMore on Pat Freiermuth and from Fantasy Points Fantasy Football
Yahoo Sports NFL
NBC Sports Rotoworld
FantasyPros Articles
FantasyPros Articles
SleeperNFL
Yahoo Sports NFL
