From the video
I did not think like I didn't play Bijan in any of my tournament teams. I didn't think Bijan was a particularly good play. I thought Gibbs was so superior to him... Fading Bijan without Brian Robinson is not fine in any way, shape, or form in this spot.
STACKED’s take
Avoided in tournaments for Gibbs; must-play when Brian Robinson out; limited workload.
Davis Mattek did not play Bijan Robinson in any of his tournament teams and did not think he was a particularly good play; he believed David Gibbs was so superior to Robinson that Robinson was not a tournament play despite the pressure to roster him. Fading Bijan Robinson without Brian Robinson in the lineup is a significant mistake; when Brian Robinson is absent, the backfield touches are consolidated, making Bijan a must-play in that game context. The source preferred two 20-touch running backs over Bijan Robinson paired with a tight end with zero upside; Bijan's workload was evaluated as limited compared to elite backs. However, Robinson was included in the source's winning DFS lineup alongside Jordan Love, Christian McCaffrey, Amon-Ra St. Brown, Matthew Golden, Ted Hurst, George Kittle, and Kate Otten, and was played as chalk in a 350K tournament lineup.
Bijan RobinsonRB · ATLPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight