From the episode

Kate Otten is going to get three for 36 always... his projection was higher than any game that he had scored this entire season... I just didn't see that. And I thought that was a pretty bad process play.

STACKED’s take

Negative signalBust

Pitts' inflated projection was a bad process play despite season-high projection.

The source criticized playing Kyle Pitts in Week 7 cash games despite a 10-point projection. The source notes that Pitts' historical production is consistently "three for 36" regardless of game circumstances, and that his Week 7 projection was higher than any game he had scored all season, making it an irresponsible process play. The source explicitly states "I didn't give two squirts what the damn projection said" and calls it a "pretty bad process play."

Kyle Pitts headshotKyle PittsTE · ATLPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight