From the video

Video: The Long Lost Germie Bernard Video
DK Metcalf at $32 million a year is going to see his target share kind of decline a little bit... Like the returns are not nearly as good as they were 2 3 years ago... you're just not seeing that level of efficiency and productivity from DK um down the field... DK is definitely the most obviously highest upside, but most volatile player in the room... static X receiver stuff for our our guy DK Metcalf

STACKED’s take

Negative signalProjection

Declining efficiency and target share at $32M; volatile role fit in truncated offense.

At $32 million per year, DK Metcalf's target share is expected to decline in Pittsburgh. Matt Harmon notes that downfield efficiency concerns are significant—his returns are not nearly as good as 2-3 years ago, with inconsistent production and testing down the field. Harmon expresses concern about DK's efficiency decline and role fit, noting "you're just not seeing that level of efficiency and productivity from DK down the field" compared to 2-3 years ago. He worries the offense will be too truncated without a true vertical threat and doesn't see DK as comfortable in a "sacrificial X receiver" role despite his high salary, expecting "static X receiver stuff" given the offense's lack of dynamic motion. DK is characterized as "the most obviously highest upside, but most volatile player in the room," making target share difficult to project.

DK Metcalf headshotDK MetcalfWR · PITPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight