NegativeValueFri, July 31, 2026Listen 34:14 – 35:58
Kyle Pitts headshot

Fade at current price due to Drake London splits; TE17 when London healthy

Kyle PittsTEATL

Ryan Heath explicitly avoids Kyle Pitts at his current draft price due to severe Drake London splits. When London was healthy (weeks 1–11), Pitts saw only 14% first-read target share in the intermediate range (5–15 yards depth), dropping to tight end 17 in fantasy points per game. When London was off the field, Pitts's intermediate target share more than doubled to 35%, demonstrating he was only involved in high-value fantasy routes for 3–4 weeks. Heath states "I'm just not paying the Kyle Pitts price uh relative to a Leaporta or to a Tucker Kraft" and "I'm out on Kyle Pittz," citing the Falcons offense upside concerns and the persistent London role conflict as reasons to fade Pitts despite his talent.

Captured by STACKED 21 hr after posting

View Kyle Pitts 2026 fantasy football value pagePlayer profile with fantasy value, ADP, projections, news, and source-backed STACKED insights
Source transcript excerpt
In Kyle Pittz's case, I think you could argue he was doing a little bit too much stretching the field earlier in his career... I have not generally been drafting honestly this whole tier... Where are you at with Kyle Pittz? Because for me, I can't really get past the Drake London splits
Common questions

Kyle Pitts fantasy football FAQ

What did Fantasy Football with Ian Hartitz say about Kyle Pitts?
Ryan Heath explicitly avoids Kyle Pitts at his current draft price due to severe Drake London splits. When London was healthy (weeks 1–11), Pitts saw only 14% first-read target share in the intermediate range (5–15 yards depth), dropping to tight end 17 in fantasy points per game. When London was off the field, Pitts's intermediate target share more than doubled to 35%, demonstrating he was only involved in high-value fantasy routes for 3–4 weeks. Heath states "I'm just not paying the Kyle Pitts price uh relative to a Leaporta or to a Tucker Kraft" and "I'm out on Kyle Pittz," citing the Falcons offense upside concerns and the persistent London role conflict as reasons to fade Pitts despite his talent.
Is this good or bad for Kyle Pitts's fantasy football value?
STACKED tags this as a negative fantasy football signal for Kyle Pitts (TE ATL). Fade at current price due to Drake London splits; TE17 when London healthy
Where can I see Kyle Pitts's full 2026 fantasy outlook, projections, and ADP?
Kyle Pitts's complete 2026 fantasy football outlook — projections, ADP movement across every platform, injury context, and all source-backed STACKED insights — is on their STACKED player profile.
Related signal

More player and source insights