From the video

Video: 10 Tight End Questions with Fantasy Points' Ryan Heath!
In Kyle Pittz's case, I think you could argue he was doing a little bit too much stretching the field earlier in his career... I have not generally been drafting honestly this whole tier... Where are you at with Kyle Pittz? Because for me, I can't really get past the Drake London splits

STACKED’s take

Negative signalValue

Fade at current price due to Drake London splits; TE17 when London healthy

Ryan Heath explicitly avoids Kyle Pitts at his current draft price due to severe Drake London splits. When London was healthy (weeks 1–11), Pitts saw only 14% first-read target share in the intermediate range (5–15 yards depth), dropping to tight end 17 in fantasy points per game. When London was off the field, Pitts's intermediate target share more than doubled to 35%, demonstrating he was only involved in high-value fantasy routes for 3–4 weeks. Heath states "I'm just not paying the Kyle Pitts price uh relative to a Leaporta or to a Tucker Kraft" and "I'm out on Kyle Pittz," citing the Falcons offense upside concerns and the persistent London role conflict as reasons to fade Pitts despite his talent.

Kyle Pitts headshotKyle PittsTE · ATLPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight