From the video

Video: He's The Backup
depending on the cost, like I'm fine with you having Trevor Lawrence, cuz are you going to be able to sell Lawrence for something? Eh, probably not, right?

STACKED’s take

Negative signalValue

Too much draft capital; hard to trade solo but movable with depth

QB2 with limited trade value and draft capital concerns. The source views Trevor Lawrence as acceptable to roster depending on cost, but does not expect to be able to trade him away for meaningful return. The source identifies Lawrence as having too much value tied into the roster at his draft position; prefers running back or wide receiver in those rounds instead. However, suggests trading Lawrence in combination with depth pieces (Christian Watson, Jadarian Price, or Jonathan Brooks) to upgrade at quarterback to a top-tier option like Josh Allen or Lamar Jackson.

Trevor Lawrence headshotTrevor LawrenceQB · JAXPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight