From the video
809 feels way too cheap for Fannon. Um, and the receivers I was debating was like Pitman, Diggs, and Matthew Golden. And I just think that Fannon's a better player than those guys. And straight up, he outprojects all of them besides Pitman. But I think Fannon has a higher ceiling in year two than Michael Pitman does with the Steelers.
STACKED’s take
Fannon at 809 is way too cheap; outprojects most receivers and has elite ceiling.
Ron Stewart believes Harold Fannon at pick 809 is significantly undervalued, stating '809 feels way too cheap for Fannon.' Stewart prefers Fannon over available receivers like Michael Pitman, Stefon Diggs, and Matthew Golden, saying 'I just think that Fannon's a better player than those guys. And straight up, he outprojects all of them besides Pitman. But I think Fannon has a higher ceiling in year two than Michael Pitman does with the Steelers.' Stewart also notes Fannon has a week-one projection of 1158 yards, which out-projects available receivers in that range (highest ranked receiver at 883 yards). Stewart is confident Fannon will be a top-five tight end and projects similarly to other receiver options in PPR scoring, potentially outscore them. However, Stewart expresses some regret about the pick due to both Fannon and Craft sharing the same bye-week, stating 'Maybe Fannon after already having Craft was a mistake,' though Stewart also believes 'Fannon can straight up outscore' Pitman.
Harold FanninCLEPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight