From the video

Video: Down bad
if you can sell a 28 first, couple future seconds, McCaffrey and Matthew Golden, and move over to two separate blue chip assets here with James Cook and Jamar Chase... you're paying Matthew Golden as well. I don't love this deal as is. If you could keep Matthew Golden, I think it would be a lot more interesting

STACKED’s take

Negative signalValue

Valuable asset to retain; avoid packaging in trades.

Matthew Golden appears in two separate trade evaluations. In a dynasty deal, Hall evaluates Golden and Christian McCaffrey (plus a 2025 first and future seconds) being moved for James Cook and Jamar Chase, approving the deal for a three-year championship window. In a second trade, Hall states 'I don't love this deal as is. If you could keep Matthew Golden, I think it would be a lot more interesting,' indicating Golden's inclusion in the trade is a negative for deal value and suggesting he should be retained rather than packaged.

Matthew Golden headshotMatthew GoldenWR · GBPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight