From the video
at tight end it was T.J. Hockenson instead of Dalton Schultz... because [ __ ] Dalton Schultz... Obviously, Schultz didn't do it this week... he ran only 22 routes and got like a 12% target share, 13% uh targets per route run... with no Nico, I thought Dalton was going to be again in the 20% target share... he got less usage than Darnell Washington, Mike Gesicki, T.J. like Michael Mayer, Gunner Helm
STACKED’s take
6 points on 22 routes, 12% target share; extreme underutilization despite game script.
Schultz scored only 6 points despite being a relatively inexpensive DFS option in a game where the Chargers trailed Buffalo and were expected to throw heavily. He ran only 22 routes and received a 12–13% target share, resulting in unexpectedly low usage that contradicted the game script expectation of high pass volume. Mattek expected 20% target share and 20% targets per route run with Nico out, but Schultz received bottom-percentile usage (bottom 20%) despite being a higher-priced play. He got less usage than Darnell Washington, Mike Gesicki, T.J., Michael Mayer, and Gunner Helm. Mattek characterizes Schultz as a 'Ponzi scheme' where repeated plays yield predictable poor results; the extreme underutilization was described as 'not normal' for his typical role. In cash games, Schultz lost the tight end decision to T.J. Hockenson.
Dalton SchultzTE · HOUPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight