From the video

If you played Roman Wilson and Cash knowing who Jeremy Bernard is, you got no mojo. The best argument for Roman was not like a data driven one at all. It was that Aaron Rogers has some liking to Roman Wilson that he does not have the Jeremy Bernard. That was a really thin argument considering sample size.
STACKED’s take
Negative signalBust
Zero points in cash; thin Aaron Rodgers preference argument vs. Jeremy Bernard
Roman Wilson was a poor cash game play with 30% field exposure. Davis Mattek argued playing Roman Wilson in cash 'got zero mojo' compared to Jeremy Bernard. The only argument for Roman was not data-driven but rather Aaron Rodgers' perceived liking for Wilson over Bernard—a 'really thin argument considering sample size on the Roman Wilson stuff.' Wilson ultimately scored zero points in the DFS slate. Later, Mattek noted he wished he could have had Wilson back in the flex spot on his best team, suggesting his models liked him, but the actual performance and cash game context made it a clear fade.
Roman WilsonWR · PITPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insightMore on Roman Wilson and from Davis Mattek
NBC Sports Rotoworld
Yahoo Sports NFL
FantasyPros Articles
Fantasy Life Articles
FFin60
Yahoo Sports NFL
