From the episode

Chris Alave and Garrett Wilson were so far different within the market. The market just loved Garrett Wilson. When their peripherals were almost identical. If not, Alave was better on a per-route-run basis.

STACKED’s take

Positive signalValue

Alave undervalued vs. Wilson despite superior per-route-run efficiency.

Alave's market valuation was significantly lower than Garrett Wilson's despite nearly identical peripherals; on a per-route-run basis, Alave was actually better. JJ Zachariason went hard on this discrepancy, suggesting Alave was undervalued relative to Wilson in the market.

Chris Olave headshotChris OlaveWR · NOPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight