From the video
comes in at wide receiver 24. I think that's fair... If Cam Ward gets to 200 passing yards, is Carnell Tate live up to wide receiver 24 or better?... if Kim Ward was averaging as many passing yards per game as Bryce Young, Colonel Tate would be averaging like 131 yards per game
STACKED’s take
WR24 with ceiling capped by Cam Ward's passing volume; must-start in weak game
Ranked WR24 for Week 7 vs. Browns, which the source considers fair given his utilization profile. Tate is top-10 in target share, first-read target share, targets per route run, and XFP per game over his last three games; single-high coverage should work in his favor. However, his ceiling is heavily dependent on Cam Ward's passing volume—if Ward reaches 200 passing yards, Tate could exceed WR24 value. The source calculated that if Ward averaged Bryce Young's passing yards per game, Tate would average 131 yards per game based on his yardage market share, but Ward's current production (often under 150 yards) severely caps Tate's upside. Must-start recommendation despite source discomfort with the matchup; part of a gross, low-scoring game environment (37.5 over/under, lowest of the week) that limits upside.
Carnell TateTENPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight