From the episode
In week two, they play they alternated drives so they would each have a drive to themselves and each of them just played a 100% running back snap share on their specific drives. So rather than rotating these guys in and putting Monty in at the goal line, what they've just done is said, hey, Montgomery is going to play 60% of the drives or two thirds of the drives. But if those are the drives that don't get to the end zone, he is SOL.
STACKED’s take
Montgomery's drive-based role makes him volatile; he's a week-to-week DFS dart, not a best ball asset.
Montgomery is at 2% ownership and $6,000 against the Colts, who have a weak defense. However, the Texans employ an unusual drive-based rotation with Woody Marks rather than traditional situational splits: Montgomery plays 60-67% of drives but receives no goal-line work if those drives stall, while Marks gets all high-value touches on his drives. This makes Montgomery highly volatile week-to-week; he scored three touchdowns in week one when his drives reached the end zone, but was ineffective in week two when Marks' drives were the productive ones. He remains playable in large field DFS if you accept the unpredictability, but this backfield structure makes him unreliable for best ball.
David MontgomeryRB · HOUPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight