
NFL DFS Deep Dive
Fantasy Points NFL DFS, best ball, and player analysis
Standard vs EXTREME Stacking Strategy in Best Ball (2026) 👀

More episodes




Latest player insights
Tucker was selected as a wide receiver in the best-ball draft. The source later characterizes Tucker, along with Ricky Pearsall and Jacoby Myers, as best-ball-specific wide receivers, implying they are better suited to best-ball formats than redraft leagues and may not be preferred in managed redraft contexts.
Strange was selected as a backup tight end in the best-ball draft. The source does not provide specific analysis on Strange, noting only that the roster includes multiple tight ends as part of the stacking strategy.
Brissett was selected as one of three quarterbacks in the best-ball draft. The source does not provide specific analysis on Brissett, noting only that the roster is heavily stacked with multiple quarterback correlations.
Mendoza was selected as one of three quarterbacks in the best-ball draft. The source does not provide specific analysis on Mendoza, noting only that the roster is heavily stacked with multiple quarterback correlations.
Mayer was selected as a tight end in the best-ball draft. The source explicitly states he really likes Michael Mayer, indicating strong personal conviction on his value.
Kittle was selected as the primary tight end in the best-ball draft. The source does not explicitly critique the pick, and the overall roster construction is described as one where the source sacrificed the least value to fit the stacking rules.
Sampson was selected in the late rounds as part of a strategy to spread bets among a group of hopeless running backs with minimal standalone value. The source notes that at pick 216, Sampson and other late-round RBs like Seth McGowan and Samaje Pirine are all similarly poor options, so tie-breaking to correlation is a reasonable approach.
Pearsall was a wide receiver at the top of the source's ranks and ADP range. The source notes that the pick made complete sense in the context of the team, with the added bonus of correlating with stacks already being built.
Lemon was selected as the wide receiver three in the Eagles stack. The source notes that with Devonta Smith and Terry McLaurin already on the roster, Lemon made sense as the stacked wide receiver option to complete the Eagles correlation.
Swift was the source's highest-available running back at the time of selection. The source notes that while the pick could have gone in multiple directions, Swift made sense as the top RB available, with the stacking correlation to the Eagles providing a bonus but not the primary reason for selection.
McLaurin was the source's highest-rated wide receiver at the time of selection and was drafted to fill a clear positional need for a second wide receiver. The source notes strong stacking synergy with Jalen Hertz and Devonta Smith on the Eagles.
Smith was one of the three highest-ranked players the source wanted to draft regardless of stacking strategy. The source also notes strong stacking synergy: having Smith and Terry McLaurin on the same team makes Jalen Hertz an automatic pick, and Smith correlates well with the Eagles stack.
Love was one of the three highest-ranked players the source wanted to draft regardless of stacking strategy, indicating strong conviction on his value and early-round appeal in best-ball formats.
McGowan is the source's slight lean for the backup running back role over Giddens and other competition. The source prefers McGowan because beat writers view it as an even competition despite the typical tie-breaker favoring non-rookies, and McGowan has received universally good reviews in camp while Giddens disappointed last year. However, McGowan will have zero standalone value unless the starter misses time.
McCaffrey is cited as an example of a running back that projects to function like a wide receiver for stacking purposes in DFS, with higher snap rates and receiving volume in trail or neutral game scripts.
Watson is mentioned as one of the source's preferred wide receiver options at the 4-5 turn alongside McLaurin and Adams.
Adams is mentioned as one of the source's preferred wide receiver options at the 4-5 turn alongside McLaurin and Watson.
McLaurin is selected at the 4-5 turn as one of the source's preferred wide receiver options. The Commanders' Week 17 matchup against the Jaguars provides stacking flexibility.
Williams is available at the 6-7 turn as part of the Lions-Bears stack opportunity. The source notes that if they secure two skill-position Bears at the 4-5 turn, coming back with Caleb creates 'a legitimately very good team.'
Diggs is mentioned as one of the source's preferred options at the 2-3 turn alongside Olave, indicating strong valuation at that draft spot.
Brown has moved significantly up the board from his historical 2-3 turn range, indicating a rise in draft capital and market valuation.
Warren has received bearish injury reporting, contributing to the weakness of the 2-3 turn running back options this year.
Jacobs was a 2-3 turn staple but has declined in ADP following off-field issues. The source notes his departure from the 2-3 turn has made that draft spot tougher overall.
Rice's ADP has declined significantly from the 2-3 turn due to knee surgery and subsequent injury concerns, though the source notes he is 'on the way back a little bit' and is 'a totally fine pick' at the 2-3 turn, suggesting the market may have overcorrected.
Smith is selected at the 2-3 turn as the source's preferred wide receiver option. The Eagles' Week 17 matchup against the 49ers provides additional stacking opportunities, with the source noting 'lots of 49ers that I enjoy.'
Olave is identified as the source's highest-rated wide receiver available at the 2-3 turn, though the source prefers not to start three running backs and opts for a wide receiver instead.
Njoku is mentioned as no longer available at the 2-3 turn; the source notes he is now gone from the board, indicating he was drafted earlier than expected in this exercise.
Swift is identified as one of three players (alongside Burden and Loveland) available at the 4-5 turn that the source has drafted above market rates. The source later advocates for taking Swift in the 4-5 turn as part of the Lions-Bears stack, noting that a running back-running back game stack is acceptable when both backs project reasonably in either game script and both have higher snap rates and receiving volume in trail/neutral script.
The source identifies Loveland as one of three players (alongside Burden and Swift) available at the 4-5 turn that the source has drafted above market rates. Loveland is part of the Lions-Bears stack opportunity in Week 17.