From the episode

Matthew Golden projects as a better point per dollar value. Uh, but I, I, I just think Christian Watson's better... Golden over his career sees a 33% target per outrun reduction against cover three.

STACKED’s take

NeutralValue

Golden's better value is offset by poor cover-three and blitz matchups versus Watson.

Ryan Heath notes Matthew Golden projects as a better point-per-dollar value than Christian Watson at 6,700. However, Heath prefers Watson due to superior schematic matchup. Golden sees a 33% target per route run reduction against cover-three and is on the wrong side of the blitz dynamic (target share drops from 25% to 19% when facing blitz), making him less appealing than Watson against the Buccaneers despite better value.

Matthew Golden headshotMatthew GoldenWR · GBPlayer page — value, ADP, projections, and every insight