Source + player page

Matt Harmon fantasy football takes on Drake London

Every source-backed video insight STACKED has extracted from Matt Harmon about Drake London.

51
Insights
42
Positive
4
Negative
Insight ledger

All Matt Harmon insights about Drake London

NegativeValueAug 28, 2026
Matt Harmon advises against drafting Drake London due to his high ADP (22.5, late second round) and the poor surrounding situation, despite acknowledging his talent. Before his injury last year, London averaged 10.4 targets per game with a 28.8% target-per-route-run rate. Harmon expresses concern that London could be forced into an X-receiver role, which would negatively impact his fantasy outlook, as his success is tied to 'Z slot' usage similar to CeeDee Lamb.
PositiveNewsJul 28, 2026
NEW #ReceptionPerception content has been added to the site 🔥 Subscribers can now find RP charts, data and my evaluations on the following 6 WRs: Christian Watson DeVonta Smith Drake London Amon-Ra St. Brown Nico Collins Garrett Wilson A lot of these players are squarely in the prime of their careers but some of them continue to show annual improvement that should force us to recalibrate how we view them. Awesome group to study, and I plan to add Chris Olave and Jameson Williams to the site...
PositiveNewsJul 28, 2026
Drake London 2025 #ReceptionPerception Profile 🔥 Some highlights: - 75.7% success rate vs. man coverage (career-best) - 83.8% success rate vs. zone (88th percentile) London is one of my favorite receivers in the league right now and is one of the best players in the new-age WR1 archetype, from a deployment and skills standpoint. Had he not gotten hurt, he was easily on his way to a career year. Luckily, his RP charting shows an open-and-shut case for him to be considered a top 10 NFL receive...
PositiveNewsJul 28, 2026
Drake London 2025 #ReceptionPerception Profile 🔥 Some highlights: - 75.7% success rate vs. man coverage (career-best) - 83.8% success rate vs. zone (88th percentile) London is one of my favorite receivers in the league right now and is one of the best players in the new-age WR1 archetype, from a deployment and skills standpoint. Had he not gotten hurt, he was easily on his way to a career year. Luckily, his RP charting shows an up-and-shut case for him to be considered a top 10 NFL receiver....
PositiveNewsJul 20, 2026
1) Still love this 2022 class of WRs. So many awesome players. 2) Love the idea of Year 5 being the peak of their powers for WRs and this class in their 4th season were a real good example case for this. I would argue that several guys like Pickens, Olave, Pierce, London, Doubs, Watson and probably more were easily the best versions of themselves in isolation in Year 4. Could argue they all set the table well for Year 5 peaks. While everyone wants to be quick to judge, my general thought is i...
NegativeProjectionJun 4, 2026
Matt Harmon expresses surprise that Nico Collins could outproduce Drake London this year despite London being drafted ahead of Collins in draft order. Harmon loves Drake London but cites uncertainty around the Falcons offense with Michael Penix Jr. as quarterback and Tatum Tonoa as a competing pass catcher. London offers more role safety relative to Collins due to his established role and despite missing games last year, but Harmon still prefers Collins given London's injury history and the uncertainty around the Falcons' offensive cohesion.
PositiveUsageNo date
Matt Harmon identifies Drake London as a stud receiver whose elite talent is finally being unlocked by functional quarterback play. London currently ranks second in the NFL in yards per route run (3.86) among receivers with at least 50 routes. In a 15-game sample with Michael Penix Jr., London has averaged 89 receiving yards per game with a 34% target-per-route rate and 8 touchdowns. Harmon notes that Penix prioritizes London, utilizing him with 30% slot usage, increased motion, and a mix of vertical routes and condensed in-breakers. While Harmon stops short of calling him a tier-one receiver due to a lack of elite speed compared to Ja'Marr Chase, he emphasizes that London's target floor is significantly higher with Penix, effectively eliminating the 'bust' games seen under previous quarterback situations.
PositiveProjectionNo date
Atlanta Falcons receiver with elite efficiency metrics and strong production with Michael Penix Jr.; ranked second in NFL in yards per route run after just one game with Penix in week three. In 15 games with Penix, London has 1,341 yards (89.4 per game). Penix targets London on 40% of his routes because London creates separation and wins contested balls. Despite being slow in open field, London remains capable of top-tier NFL receiver production when paired with competent quarterback; with Penix clearing the bar as a competent QB (unlike Cooper Rush), London produces like a top-level receiver.
PositiveRoleNo date
Matt Harmon cites Drake London as a prospect comparable to Tetairoa McMillan, noting London was 'slightly better' as a prospect. Harmon highlights that a key part of unlocking Drake London's production was moving him from X-only alignment to 30%+ slot usage, using him more off-the-ball than on-the-ball over the last two seasons. Under Arthur Smith (years 1–2), London was at 85% and 82% on-ball snap alignment as a pure X receiver; under Zack Robinson in a motion-heavy, Z receiver role, he dropped to 47% and 46.7%. This demonstrates how offensive scheme and role flexibility can dramatically shift on-ball alignment percentages, and Harmon suggests McMillan could see similar production gains by increasing to 30%+ slot usage.
PositiveProjectionNo date
Matt Harmon argues Drake London's production metrics are elite despite offensive context limitations: 7th in NFL in yards per route run, 28.7% target rate (incredibly high), and top-10 receiver ranking even by pure production standards. Harmon emphasizes that London's stats would improve significantly if placed in a better offensive system like the Los Angeles Rams or Detroit Lions, suggesting current production undervalues his true talent and opportunity ceiling.