Exploit ESPN ADP
Find fantasy football draft values by comparing ESPN ADP with STACKED Rankings. This ESPN ADP exploit board surfaces the biggest platform-specific gaps so you can spot values, reaches, and the rounds where patience pays.
Largest split
TE · DET
ESPN ADP
169.9
vs STACKED Rankings
-96.1
Drafted 96.1 picks earlier on ESPN.
Players compared
75
Scoring lens
0.5 PPR
Data through
Aug 11, 2026
ADP vs draft-room ranking
How to exploit ESPN ADP
ADP is average draft position — where players are actually being picked. A default draft-room ranking is the order the platform shows before managers apply custom rankings. ESPN publishes one managed-league room ADP and a draft-room rank rather than a separate half-PPR feed, so both live room signals are compared with STACKED Rankings.
ESPN ADP
ESPN ADP shows the average pick where players are selected; it measures draft behavior rather than the platform's preferred order.
ESPN draft-room rank
ESPN draft-room rank is the default player ordering ESPN shows in its draft room; it is a platform ranking, not the same thing as average pick position.
Choose whether the biggest gap is against ESPN ADP or ESPN room rank. Positive means a potential value window on ESPN; negative means the room is taking the player earlier than the reference.
Platform ADP exploit board
Biggest ESPN ADP gaps and draft values
Compare ESPN ADP or its draft-room signal with STACKED Rankings. The gap sort keeps the sign, so positive and negative pick differences remain distinct.
Board filters
Set maximum ADP or rank values to focus on a section of the board. Active filters work together.
Showing 75 of 75 players
| # | Player | ESPN ADP | Room rank | STACKED Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WRQuentin JohnstonLAC | 144.2 | — | 81.0 | +63.2Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 2 | TEOronde GadsdenLAC | 169.7 | — | 111.0 | +58.7Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 3 | WRChris GodwinTB | 147.1 | — | 90.0 | +57.1Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 4 | WRJayden ReedGB | 140.7 | 157.0 | 92.0 | +48.7Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 5 | WRMike EvansSF | 96.8 | 112.0 | 57.0 | +39.8Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 6 | WRChristian WatsonGB | 102.0 | 114.0 | 63.0 | +39.0Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 7 | WRParker WashingtonJAX | 102.8 | 113.0 | 66.0 | +36.8Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 8 | RBChuba HubbardCAR | 114.8 | 138.0 | 79.0 | +35.8Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 9 | RBRhamondre StevensonNE | 112.6 | 135.0 | 78.0 | +34.6Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 10 | QBJustin HerbertLAC | 109.4 | 131.0 | 75.0 | +34.4Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 11 | WRMakai LemonPHI | 117.4 | 128.0 | 83.0 | +34.4Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 12 | WRBrian Thomas Jr.JAX | 106.0 | 117.0 | 72.0 | +34.0Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 13 | TETucker KraftGB | 100.2 | 142.0 | 67.0 | +33.2Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 14 | WRCooper KuppSEA | 168.8 | — | 136.0 | +32.8Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 15 | RBJordan MasonMIN | 157.1 | — | 125.0 | +32.1Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 16 | RBRJ HarveyDEN | 129.4 | 150.0 | 98.0 | +31.4Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 17 | RBBlake CorumLAR | 140.4 | 168.0 | 109.0 | +31.4Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 18 | RBJonathon BrooksCAR | 129.7 | 148.0 | 99.0 | +30.7Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 19 | WRLuther BurdenCHI | 77.0 | 85.0 | 47.0 | +30.0Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 20 | WRJosh DownsIND | 123.5 | 129.0 | 94.0 | +29.5Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 21 | RBJ.K. DobbinsDEN | 124.5 | 149.0 | 95.0 | +29.5Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 22 | RBKyle MonangaiCHI | 133.2 | 161.0 | 104.0 | +29.2Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 23 | QBAaron RodgersPIT | 169.0 | — | 140.0 | +29.0Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 24 | WRJordyn TysonNO | 98.5 | 104.0 | 70.0 | +28.5Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 25 | WRStefon DiggsWAS | 145.3 | — | 117.0 | +28.3Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 26 | RBJaylen WarrenPIT | 104.6 | 134.0 | 77.0 | +27.6Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 27 | QBJordan LoveGB | 159.3 | — | 133.0 | +26.3Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 28 | TEDalton KincaidBUF | 136.8 | 164.0 | 114.0 | +22.8Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 29 | RBDavid MontgomeryHOU | 75.7 | 95.0 | 53.0 | +22.7Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 30 | QBKyler MurrayMIN | 151.2 | — | 129.0 | +22.2Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 31 | RBBhayshul TutenJAX | 79.6 | 93.0 | 58.0 | +21.6Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 32 | TEHunter HenryNE | 142.9 | 165.0 | 122.0 | +20.9Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 33 | QBFernando MendozaLV | 166.9 | — | 147.0 | +19.9Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 34 | QBCaleb WilliamsCHI | 92.5 | 124.0 | 73.0 | +19.5Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 35 | WRTee HigginsCIN | 57.9 | 78.0 | 39.0 | +18.9Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 36 | WRXavier WorthyKC | 136.8 | 158.0 | 118.0 | +18.8Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 37 | WRJordan AddisonMIN | 123.5 | 130.0 | 105.0 | +18.5Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 38 | WRRomeo DoubsNE | 151.8 | — | 134.0 | +17.8Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 39 | WRJaylen WaddleDEN | 60.4 | 79.0 | 43.0 | +17.4Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 40 | WRJakobi MeyersJAX | 117.4 | 125.0 | 100.0 | +17.4Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 41 | RBTreVeyon HendersonNE | 71.3 | 91.0 | 54.0 | +17.3Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 42 | QBBryce YoungCAR | 168.2 | — | 151.0 | +17.2Espn ADP · later vs STACKED Rankings |
| 43 | QBBo NixDEN | 91.0 | 120.0 | 108.0 | -17.0Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 44 | WRRashid ShaheedSEA | 157.4 | — | 176.0 | -18.6Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 45 | WRDenzel BostonCLE | 166.7 | — | 187.0 | -20.3Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 46 | RBTyrone TracyNYG | 167.5 | — | 188.0 | -20.5Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 47 | WRTravis HunterJAX | 116.7 | 127.0 | 139.0 | -22.3Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 48 | TEJuwan JohnsonNO | 164.1 | — | 189.0 | -24.9Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 49 | RBTank BigsbyPHI | 167.6 | — | 195.0 | -27.4Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 50 | WRTyreek HillFA | 169.8 | — | 200.0 | -30.2Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 51 | WRDeebo SamuelSF | 135.6 | — | 167.0 | -31.4Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 52 | WRDe'Zhaun StriblingSF | 169.5 | — | 202.0 | -32.5Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 53 | RBTyjae SpearsTEN | 168.5 | — | 205.0 | -36.5Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 54 | RBWoody MarksHOU | 151.5 | 169.0 | 199.0 | -47.5Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 55 | TET.J. HockensonMIN | 133.7 | 155.0 | 185.0 | -51.3Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 56 | WRAdonai MitchellNYJ | 169.5 | — | 224.0 | -54.5Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 57 | WRTre TuckerLV | 168.3 | — | 223.0 | -54.7Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 58 | WRJa'Kobi LaneBAL | 169.1 | — | 228.0 | -58.9Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 59 | WRJerry JeudyCLE | 161.4 | — | 222.0 | -60.6Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 60 | WRCalvin RidleyTEN | 167.1 | — | 229.0 | -61.9Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 61 | WRTank DellHOU | 168.0 | — | 230.0 | -62.0Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 62 | WROdell BeckhamNYG | 169.1 | — | 232.0 | -62.9Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 63 | QBShedeur SandersCLE | 169.2 | — | 233.0 | -63.8Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 64 | TEDarnell WashingtonPIT | 169.4 | — | 237.0 | -67.6Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 65 | QBCarson BeckFA | 169.6 | — | 242.0 | -72.4Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 66 | QBJ.J. McCarthyFA | 169.7 | — | 245.0 | -75.3Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 67 | TECole KmetCHI | 169.7 | — | 246.0 | -76.3Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 68 | WRCyrus AllenKC | 169.7 | — | 250.0 | -80.3Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 69 | TEDawson KnoxBUF | 169.8 | — | 255.0 | -85.2Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 70 | TETyler HigbeeLAR | 169.8 | — | 260.0 | -90.2Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 71 | TEElijah ArroyoSEA | 169.9 | — | 261.0 | -91.1Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 72 | WRJuJu Smith-SchusterNYG | 169.9 | — | 263.0 | -93.1Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 73 | WRKaVontae TurpinDAL | 169.9 | — | 264.0 | -94.1Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 74 | WRMalachi FieldsNYG | 169.9 | — | 265.0 | -95.1Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
| 75 | TEBrock WrightDET | 169.9 | — | 266.0 | -96.1Espn ADP · earlier vs STACKED Rankings |
Fantasy football ADP help
ESPN ADP exploit FAQ
What does it mean to exploit ESPN ADP?
To exploit ESPN ADP, compare the platform's draft-room price or default ranking with STACKED Rankings. A player going materially later on ESPN can be a draft value; a player going earlier can be a premium or reach.
What is the difference between ESPN ADP and ESPN draft-room rank?
ESPN draft-room rank is the default player ordering ESPN shows in its draft room; it is a platform ranking, not the same thing as average pick position. ADP measures actual draft behavior, while a default ranking shows how the platform orders players before a manager applies custom rankings. STACKED Rankings provide the comparison point for every platform signal on this board.
How does STACKED calculate ESPN draft-room gaps?
Choose ESPN ADP or ESPN draft-room rank as the comparison signal, then STACKED compares it with STACKED Rankings. A positive number means the player is going later on ESPN; a negative number means the room is taking the player earlier.
Turn the gap into a draft plan
Bring the board into a live mock, set your targets, and see whether the room lets them fall.