Davis Mattek artwork

The Best Week 7 NFL DFS Plays

STACKED extracted the fantasy-relevant player signal from this video and kept the full transcript here for context.

1 hr 6 min
Duration
Estimated from transcript
Oct 22, 2026
Published
Thu, October 22, 2026
47
Player insights
47
Players mentioned
Topics
Aaron JonesAdonai MitchellAlec PierceAmon-Ra St. BrownBaker MayfieldBam KnightBraelon AllenBrandin CooksBreece HallBucky IrvingCarnell TateChase BrownChris GodwinChristian Kirk
Player analysis

Player insights

47

Aaron Jones

NegativeValue10:34

Completely off the board for DFS this week because his price does not reflect Jordan Mason's return to the backfield; the pricing has not adjusted for the usage shift.

Insight page

Adonai Mitchell

NegativeRole26:24

Returning from injury this week at $4,500; will split targets with Omar Cooper Jr.; both receivers must split approximately eight targets between them, creating uncertainty about target allocation and fantasy upside.

Insight page

Alec Pierce

NegativeRole16:51

Pierce was given significant contract money by the Colts but doesn't play anymore, representing a poor allocation of resources that limited the team's ability to build a competitive roster around Daniel Jones.

Insight page

Amon-Ra St. Brown

PositiveValue46:58

St. Brown becomes an insanely good leverage play if Gibbs' ownership is as low as projected (18%). His value is enhanced by the expectation that most players will be concentrated on Gibbs in the high-total Packers–Lions game.

Insight page

Baker Mayfield

PositiveRole33:55

Baker Mayfield returned to practice and is expected to be back in the lineup this week; Davis Mattek notes this is huge for Bucky Irving's checkdown opportunities and offensive efficiency, as Mayfield will reduce defensive pressure on the run game and provide checkdown targets that Jaylen Daniels avoids.

Insight page

Bam Knight

NegativeRole44:04

Knight has taken over Jeremiah Love's backfield role and played so well that he will retain a significant share of snaps even when Love returns. This strong performance makes both Knight and Love unplayable in the short term, as Knight will receive the bulk of the work and Love will be limited to ceremonial snaps.

Insight page

Braelon Allen

PositiveProjection26:50

Complete jam play against Miami; gets all running back goal line touches and almost all running back receiving; incredible matchup; will be extremely owned but ownership does not make him a bad play in DFS sim era; price is not rising high enough relative to his volume; every-lineup style player; gets a million touches.

Insight page

Brandin Cooks

PositiveRole17:15

Brandon Cooks is more of a deep threat than a target volume guy and is probably even more washed than Christian Kirk, limiting his appeal as a pass-catcher option in the 49ers-Falcons game. Davis Mattek explicitly fades Cooks for Week 7 DFS and would not play him or other secondary receivers in the Falcons stack, preferring Kirk Cousins as the only secondary option worth considering given the expensive nature of stacking around Patrick Mahomes and Christian McCaffrey.

Insight page

Breece Hall

NegativeUsage28:30

The Jets employ a rotational run-back system where they cycle between Breece Hall and Isaiah Davis in blocks of carries; Davis Mattek describes a pattern where Hall gets five consecutive runs, then Davis gets three runs, then Hall returns for five more runs. Carries are split approximately 73 between Hall and Davis, with this rotational approach limiting individual back upside and consistent with their game script philosophy of long, run-heavy drives.

Insight page

Bucky Irving

PositiveValue34:06

DFS value at $6,100 on DraftKings with strong snap rate; coming off 81% snap rate game with 61-9 snap split over Kenneth Gainwell; very interesting spot as Gainwell has underperformed despite significant contract investment. Expected to benefit from Baker Mayfield's return to lineup, which will add 2-3 additional checkdowns on top of 4-5 weekly targets and screens; currently limited by Jaylen Daniels' aversion to checking down. Davis Mattek identifies Irving as the only player with real upside on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers offense, which lacks gas outside of him.

Insight page

Carnell Tate

PositiveValue31:29

Carnell Tate has target shares above 25% in four of his six games and his aDOT is rising; Davis Mattek is 'Tate curious' this week because ownership will be condensed at wide receiver, making any player with theoretical upside for a 27-yard touchdown in a lightly projectable way interesting. The source does not expect Tate to be heavily owned, creating value in DFS.

Insight page

Chase Brown

PositiveBreakout23:52

Chase Brown offers DFS upside if you're brave enough to plant your flag on him for Week 7; Davis Mattek suggests he could get paid because he has shown the ability to produce in the past, implying recent performance or role changes have created opportunity for a breakout game. He's a contrarian play with significant upside if Lamar plays; has historical precedent of performing well in similar situations. If the Ravens game becomes high-scoring, Brown benefits from potential comeback mode all game, making him a more attractive play despite not being chalk.

Insight page

Chris Godwin

PositiveBust36:24

One of the worst players in the National Football League this season; best game is 3 catches for 46 yards; saw 29 targets in three games with Jaylen Daniels but converted only 98 yards on those 29 targets, indicating severe inefficiency and lack of juice on the team. Davis Mattek attributes this partly to quarterback play and the Buccaneers' lack of offensive weapons (Kadarius Toney had 41 routes and 1 target), making Godwin not a great fantasy option.

Insight page

Christian Kirk

NegativeRole16:57

Kirk is being promoted off IR this week at $3,600 and Davis Mattek's interest depends entirely on ownership levels. If Kirk is not heavily owned, he could be a fine play given the Falcons' dire receiving situation (Brandon Cooks is a deep threat not a volume guy, Jordan Watkins had only 3% target per throw rate). However, Kirk faces obvious paths to failure: he's coming off an 8-week calf strain, had 4.8 yards per target last year on Houston, and could see limited snaps with Jordan Watkins and Brandon Cooks getting primary reps. Mattek's base assumption is that Kirk is terrible, though he did have a 30-point fantasy game in the postseason against Houston last year.

Insight page

Christian McCaffrey

PositiveProjection17:24

McCaffrey has a base projection of 26 points for Week 7 against Atlanta and Davis Mattek recommends playing him in every lineup, viewing him as a complete jam despite the Falcons' high team total (50.5 points) that will draw heavy usage to both McCaffrey and Gibbs. McCaffrey finally has a game where he's super involved in the passing game after limited involvement earlier in the season; ownership has completely flipped from being underowned relative to Bejon Robinson to now overowned, but Mattek remains open-minded to playing him despite the ownership shift, noting that one week of heavy passing involvement may not represent a permanent role change.

Insight page

Chuba Hubbard

PositiveValue34:03

Chuba Hubbard is a DFS play at $6,700 with Christian McCaffrey-like role and Jalen Gibbs-level usage; Davis Mattek notes he is consistently getting the ball with 2.5-yard carries and the pricing gap between him and Bucky Irving effectively delineates projection difference. Positive outlook assuming Baker Mayfield plays.

Insight page

Daniel Jones

NegativeProjection16:59

Playing significantly worse than last year, accounting for over 50% of the Colts' offensive decline; the source argues the Colts' 2026 offseason mistake was overpaying Jones instead of building around a strong roster with a cheap QB. The overpayment forced the team to lose Michael Pittman Jr. and replace him with aging Keenan Allen, and lose multiple defensive players they couldn't afford to replace. The source speculates that a healthy Kyler Murray would have produced better results with the same supporting cast.

Insight page

Deebo Samuel

PositiveDepth Chart17:28

Debo Samuel is out for the 49ers-Falcons game, creating target volume questions for the 49ers passing game.

Insight page

Demarcus Robinson

PositiveDepth Chart17:28

Demarcus Robinson is out for the 49ers-Falcons game, creating target volume questions for the 49ers passing game.

Insight page

Derrick Henry

PositiveProjection24:45

Super fun play if Lamar Jackson plays; becomes playable in high-scoring Ravens game scenario; would not be recommended with Huntley at QB due to insufficient raw rushing volume; benefits from game-stacking upside if Lamar is active.

Insight page

Dylan Sampson

PositiveRole32:00

Dylan Samson, the 2024 SEC Offensive Player of the Year, is positioned to take over passing work if both he and Tony Judkins are active; Davis Mattek suggests Samson would snatch the passing-down work that Judkins was receiving before his ankle injury, giving Samson upside in a backup role.

Insight page

Garrett Wilson

NegativeMatchup27:48

Great matchup against Miami Dolphins, but volume concerns exist due to Jets' run-heavy offensive philosophy; the source questions what the actual target volume will be given the team's commitment to the run game.

Insight page

Isaiah Davis

NegativeUsage28:30

Isaiah Davis is part of the Jets' rotational run-back committee with Breece Hall; Davis Mattek projects the carries will be split approximately 73 between Hall and Davis, with Davis getting inserted for short blocks of three carries before being rotated out for Hall's next set of five carries. This rotational approach limits individual back upside.

Insight page

Isaiah Likely

PositiveValue1:02

TE is artificially underpriced on DraftKings due to the tight end pricing algorithm; if he were priced as a wide receiver based on his target volume, he would cost 6,500 instead of 5,300 or whatever his current price is. This pricing inefficiency makes him a strong DFS value play in what projects as a double tight end week; Davis Mattek notes he will suffer consequences from JJ McCarthy's expected poor performance, but the pricing advantage still makes him playable.

Insight page

J.J. McCarthy

NegativeProjection0:06

Starting QB for Giants is expected to regress significantly from his fourth-quarter performance against New Orleans; Davis Mattek is only 4% confident in McCarthy's ability to replicate that success and expects him to underperform, making him a fade for DFS despite acknowledging a scenario where Houston's lead forces Giants into pass-heavy mode.

Insight page

J.K. Dobbins

NegativeBust41:53

Davis Mattek will not play Dobbins this week; he has played poorly all season. Jonah Coleman's return from IR will dock Dobbins' projection by a couple of points, as Coleman's work is expected to come more from Dobbins than from Harvey.

Insight page

Ja'Marr Chase

NegativeProjection22:48

Jamar Chase will not be played on the DFS slate at all because his projection is worse than Bejian Robinson and Christian McCaffrey, who are sitting at very similar prices. Additionally, Puka Nacua and Jeff Gibbs project way too well, making them better allocation targets than Chase in the same game.

Insight page

Jalen Coker

PositiveValue39:00

Davis Mattek initially had Coker ranked too low in dynasty ratings but immediately adjusted after Coker's recent performance. At $6,100 DFS pricing, Mattek believes Coker should be priced higher and ranked as a top-20 wide receiver for the rest of the season, comparable to T. Higgins. Coker will likely be underowned in DFS this week despite earning his elevated status.

Insight page

Jaylen Waddle

PositiveValue40:37

DFS value at $5,500 with 25% target share, 64% catch rate, and 14 PPR points in recent games; Miami's team total is 24.5 on a 44.5 game total. Davis Mattek describes him as a 'plug your nose play'—cheap enough to deploy despite historical inconsistency, with strong matchup fundamentals. Mattek expresses strong conviction to play Waddle with personal money in Week 7, driven by Bo Nicks' historically poor quarterback play (ranked 701st out of 701 in average depth of target), which should force a high-volume game for Waddle with 12+ targets expected. Waddle's cheap pricing combined with a strong matchup against Arizona makes him a smash play if Nicks can execute.

Insight page

Jeremiyah Love

NegativeInjury44:04

Love is not expected to play this week due to an ankle injury. When he returns, his role will be significantly impacted because Bam Knight has played so well that coaches will not remove Knight entirely; instead, Love will likely receive only ceremonial snaps that directly come from his previous role, creating a problematic backfield situation.

Insight page

Jonah Coleman

NegativeDepth Chart42:50

Coleman is returning from IR this week. While Davis Mattek does not expect a huge role for Coleman, his work will dock JK Dobbins' projection by a couple of points, as Coleman's touches are expected to come more from Dobbins than from Harvey.

Insight page

Jonathan Taylor

NegativeRole12:14

Guaranteed to get all the work in the Colts backfield; playable only if the Colts show up with pride and effort, which is uncertain given the team's dysfunction and potential blowout risk.

Insight page

Jordan Mason

NegativeRole10:10

RB is returning from injury this week for the 49ers; his return directly impacts Aaron Jones' fantasy value and deployment, making Jones' current price not reflective of the backfield shift.

Insight page

Jordan Watkins

NegativeValue17:28

Jordan Watkins is an explicit DFS fade for Week 7. He has a 3% target per throw rate, making him an unappealing option in the 49ers-Falcons game. Davis Mattek would not play him or other secondary receivers in the Kansas City stack, preferring Kirk Cousins as the only secondary option worth considering given the expensive nature of stacking around Patrick Mahomes and Christian McCaffrey.

Insight page

Keenan Allen

NegativeValue16:46

At $4,800 DFS price, Allen is a half-decent play against Colts defense; likely to see volume as a hot route option against Flores' blitzing scheme. Even if Tyler Warren returns, Allen's price has not risen much on DraftKings, and the source expects he will see significant usage given the high team total (50.5 points) in the 49ers-Falcons game and tight salary constraints on the slate.

Insight page

Kenneth Gainwell

NegativeBust34:06

Poor return on investment for Buccaneers despite significant contract; very little production; one of the worst picks on the board. 61-9 snap split last week indicates he is losing work to Bucky Irving, who is emerging as the preferred option in the backfield.

Insight page

Kirk Cousins

PositiveValue18:48

Kirk Cousins is a fine DFS play if negative assumptions about him persist in ownership; Davis Mattek emphasizes that if everyone fades him as a jam, he becomes contrarian value. Ownership-dependent play with upside if the field is overexposed to more obvious wide receiver targets.

Insight page

Kyle Pitts

PositiveUsage22:02

Kyle Pitts is probably playable for DFS Week 7 because he will never play in games the Falcons are leading, meaning he's concentrated in obvious passing situations. His targets per route run numbers are all pretty good because he only plays in these high-leverage passing situations, similar to Luther Burton's usage pattern where he doesn't play in heavy personnel packages.

Insight page

Kyler Murray

PositiveMatchup10:10

Recommended stack play against weak Colts defense; Davis Mattek explicitly endorses the Kyler Murray and Justin Jefferson stack as a DFS deployment given Indianapolis' defensive vulnerabilities, especially without Sauce Gardner.

Insight page

Lamar Jackson

NegativeInjury22:28

Lamar Jackson's availability for Week 7 is uncertain; he did not practice on Wednesday, and Crack Rockck tweeted that Lamar Jackson will not be playing. However, the Vegas line remained at Baltimore -3.5 point favorites, suggesting the sportsbook still expects him to play. Davis Mattek believes Lamar Jackson will likely play despite the injury concern, making the entire Cincinnati-Baltimore game dependent on his status. If he plays, the game has potential to be a 'total carnival' with high-upside stacking potential; if Huntley starts instead, Ravens become largely unplayable.

Insight page

Malik Nabers

PositiveValue0:24

WR has received 34 targets over the last two weeks with back-to-back double-digit target games, yet his DFS price has barely risen; Davis Mattek believes his target share numbers are insane and implies he remains underpriced relative to his volume.

Insight page

Mark Andrews

NegativeBust23:16

Mark Andrews is a DFS fade for Week 7; Davis Mattek expresses that his fantasy production has completely dried up and is not coming back. This represents a season-long decline commentary suggesting Andrews no longer has the ceiling or floor to justify DFS exposure.

Insight page

Michael Pittman

NegativeDepth Chart16:59

Pittman was lost by the Colts in free agency and replaced with aging Keenan Allen due to salary cap constraints created by the Daniel Jones contract. The source views this as a poorly conceived offseason that forced the Colts to lose multiple defensive players they couldn't afford to replace.

Insight page

Michael Wilson

PositiveSleeper45:03

Wilson remains a strong play as a low-owned option with 2–5% projected ownership. His XFP profile is still strong despite recent volatility, capable of 4 for 40 or 11 for 117 performances. He was limited in practice Wednesday, indicating he will play. His appeal is contingent on Patrick Surtain II's final game status, as Surtain would likely draw coverage on Wilson.

Insight page

Mike Evans

PositiveDepth Chart17:28

Mike Evans is out for the 49ers-Falcons game, creating target volume questions for the 49ers passing game.

Insight page

Omar Cooper Jr.

PositiveValue27:57

At $4,100, the source has been impressed and wants to play him; however, the key is monitoring ownership and whether projections are too bearish on his route rate. If projections underestimate his route rate and overestimate AD Mitchell's target share, there is upside to play him without eating too much salary; if AD Mitchell returns, both receivers must split approximately eight targets between them, creating uncertainty about target allocation. FFPC pricing suggests people are excited to play him.

Insight page

Woody Marks

NegativeValue8:09

RB is inefficient and difficult to justify in DFS despite a cheap salary of $5,600. Davis Mattek would like to play him at that price point but can't get comfortable with the projection due to his poor efficiency metrics, even though he's likely to get all the work if Montgomery doesn't play.

Insight page
Full transcript

Episode Transcript

625
0:00top 1,000 team in the Millie Maker generated on this show last week. We're going to go through every game on the
0:06main DFS slate. Give the best plays beginning with the New York Giants at the Houston Texans. JJ McCarthy is starting this game, not Jameus Winston.
0:15You and I have been, I think, pretty aligned on the neighbors likely stuff since the season started. Just like, oh well, these guys are just going to get
0:24the ball every single play. The question I have to you Jacob is Malik Neighbors barely has risen in price despite back-to-back games of double-digit
0:33targets. I I believe 34 targets the most recent two weeks from Malik Neighbors likely target share numbers just as insane. Are we buying JJ McCarthy's
0:42fourth quarter performance uh against Shell, you know, the most vanilla defensive looks imaginable from the New Orleans Saints or are we going to get JJ
0:51McCarthy returning back to to whence we have known him?
0:56I'm guessing the latter, but I'll admit to being like 4% JJ McCarthy curious.
1:02I'm I'm slightly JJ McCarthy curious, but I I'm for the most part, my expectation is he's going to suck. And my expectation is that Malik Neighbors
1:12and Isaiah Likely will suffer the consequences for J.J.
1:18McCarthy spurt of reasonable results. I won't even necessarily say reasonable play. I I mean, nobody did a better breakdown to me of like the playbyplay
1:28experience of watching JJ McCarthy than Gretch this week in Signals. Um, which was very helpful in bringing me back off the ledge of worrying that JJ McCarthy
1:37was all of a sudden going to make me eat all the slander that I'd tweeted out about him over the years. But, um, yeah,
1:45I I think that probably it's going to be a downgrade for the Giants offense. I I mean I still think that Neighbors
1:53and likely are playable like they're not like fully off my board. It's easy to envision a scenario where Houston gets off to a big lead and the Giants go into
2:03this pass happy mode that they've been going into with Jamus and like we just saw that J.J. McCarthy can obviously put
2:11up statistics in that scenario. So it's not like it's completely off the board, but I'll probably [snorts] be avoiding the Giants this week I think. Um,
2:20I I wouldn't be against playing like, you know, a one-off Texan at all by by any stretch, particularly Nico Collins.
2:28Um, I think that the the Giants have been vulnerable enough on on defense that you could talk yourself into that for sure, but I'm not probably game
2:35stacking us as aggressively as I was the Saints Giants game last week. Now, I do want to I do want to raise something,
2:42which is that depending on how you look at J.J. McCarthy, if you want to squint and really embrace the 4% of yourself
2:48that is JJ McCarthy curious, there was that stretch of games he had when he returned from the first injury before he
2:57got hurt again. They go against the Commanders. He goes 16 to 23, 163 yards, three touchdowns, no picks. Then he beats Dallas on the road, a Dallas team
3:07that was like on the ropes. Had to win.
3:09Um, you know, like like Dallas was really trying in that game. 15 to 24 for 250 and two, 10.4 YPA. Then gets injured
3:17in that game against the Giants. Comes back and kind of does nothing in a win against the Green Bay Packers. The
3:23stretch of games that we remember of McCarthy being terrible was that four game stretch from week eight to week 11 where he did look like the worst
3:31quarterback anyone has ever. It was just like that was the peak of him firing fast balls to no one us try and and he
3:39had we had just gotten very usable stretches from Justin Jefferson with Carson Wentz at quarterback. So as as also pertains very funny because we're
3:48talking about two quarterbacks who are related here Kyler Murray as pertains to the Kyler Murray discourse. The reason why everyone's so mad and and thinks
3:56Kyler Murray is worse than he actually is is because he was not able to generate fantasy football numbers for Trey McBride the same way the backup was
4:04able to. So that definitely trans I'm not saying McCarthy is good. I'm not saying any of the process of anything the Vikings did. I I'd also like to to
4:12raise one more opinion, not to go too Thor Nistrom coded here, but we do give KOC a lot of credit for being a
4:22quarterback whisperer, right? And if you really look at it, if you really start, you go, okay, well, he did the thing
4:28with Darnold, but what really changed Darnold's career, if you wanted to argue it this way, would be the year he spent
4:33in San Francisco with Kyle Shannon.
4:35>> He came to him pre-whispered.
4:37>> He came to him pre-whispered. Now, I'm not even saying I believe this. I am just offering the argument that you
4:43could believe this if you if you wanted to. And also, you know, the what was it about three and a half games of Josh
4:49Dobs looking like a competent NFL quarterback was a part of that as well.
4:53And I think you could just write that off to kind of like I don't know, the guy was thrown to Justin Jefferson.
4:57Sometimes things just happen. But if you really look into the the whispering of KOC, I I think it becomes harder and
5:04harder to hear the closer you look at it. Uh thoughts thoughts on that? I I think the KOC criticism is honestly
5:13fair. Like he he got a lot of credit for what he was able to do with Sam Darnold.
5:21I mean, in fairness, Sam Darnold is not playing very well this year, >> but some degree great point. Yeah.
5:28>> But some degree of KOC's credit um I think, you know, it was diluted last year when it showed that like no, that
5:35one Darnold year was not like a complete fluke. um you know given the right kind of Shanahan scheme he he obviously and
5:43and an elite wide receiver to throw to of course in Seattle as well he's able to have some level of success that's
5:49sustainable um yeah had to get had to get past Cousins the Mullins do stuff was kind of hit and miss I I I think that it's I think the
6:00that the shine is a little bit off of him I still like don't buy that last year was not a good environment like You
6:08still have, I think, at least an above average pass game designer in KOC. You have >> elite weaponry.
6:16>> The O line was bad. I'll give him that.
6:18Um, I mean, I guess the the main reason I think to believe in JJ would just be like he came into the NFL super young.
6:28He's still, I think, the youngest starter in the league right now.
6:31um you know he had like enough physical tools and pedigree to get him drafted round one like we we have seen
6:39quarterbacks that are drafted >> he's only he's only 23 right now third third year of his NFL career he's only 23
6:47>> whole life ahead of him >> yeah way crazier things have happened than round one quarterback starts his career looking terrible and then
6:54eventually puts it together like that's that's happened before I I guess it would just surprise me if it was this year because like even if the the shine
7:03is off Casey a bit, I guess I don't think he's like a total [ __ ] and I think that if JJ showed up to camp this
7:09summer and he looked substantially better, like he either would have won the job over Kyler in camp or he at least would have still been with the
7:17team as a backup. Um, and so it would surprise me if he looked like bad enough to get the motive to third string and
7:25traded off the team just to instantly be awesome with the New York Giants. Like I mean that would be incredibly embarrassing for
7:32>> So So this is where I find it interesting because I actually don't think he has to be awesome because Jamus
7:38was not awesome, right? All all we have to get from JJ McCarthy, frankly, like an early pick six from J.J. McCarthy
7:45wouldn't even be that bad because we we don't even get an attempt to pretend to establish Tyrone Tracy or Devin Singleary or Scataboo or whatever they I
7:54guess a quick note on the the backfield here.
7:56>> Well, don't blame him in DFS. Yeah, don't blame it. There's there's no way you can do enough to get any despite the
8:02fact that they're cheap. There's no way you can massage the projections for the Giants backfield to get any of these guys to be playable. And frankly, I
8:09would even say the same is true with Marks, assuming Montgomery does not play. Like, I would like to play Woody Marks, but I just don't. He's been so
8:15inefficient. And the >> You would like to play Woody Marks? I wouldn't like >> I would like to have a $5,600 running
8:21backable in in the contract.
8:23>> You can play Woody Marks. Like the the Giants run defense isn't great. I I mean my my King Jaward Jordan is on IR.
8:31>> Yeah, that was a bummer. That was a bummer.
8:32>> So like Marks is probably going to get all of the work. Like we just saw Damen Pierce get 15 points last week and he
8:38>> I guess I guess >> who do we think is the Texans reserve running back now? Um let's go. Let's go
8:45learn a name together. So Dar >> Oh, I actually looked this up. No, I forget.
8:50>> It's actually a guy who's deep in ship chasing lore.
8:54I attended college. Uh uh he he went to the same college I did.
8:58>> Uh Dthon.
9:00>> Dvon. Dvon. Wow. Yeah. We we might get a couple Dvon rushes here. Um I I'm ultimately going to side assuming that
9:08ownerships are very reserved on neighbors and likely which I don't think they're going to be as low as is projected right now on Run the Sims like
9:153%. But I don't it I certainly don't think either of them will get to double digits. And that to me, despite the low
9:23team total, despite all this stuff, I think there's enough of a chance that McCarthy, I mean, maybe even gets the garbageio time, right? Maybe even gets
9:30what he got last week that I think and and the Giants probably because all of these coaches are loosely trying to
9:38coach for their like reputations. Like Naggie is trying to like redo his his life. Greg Roman's trying to redo his life. Callahan uh you know Harbaugh made
9:46this big bet uh you know basically saying like I don't want to work with Lamar anymore and the Ravens said peace
9:52you know uh enjoy enjoy your time like I they're they're one of these teams they're going to keep gunning for it in
9:58the fourth quarter if anything to keep scores close. So I'm I am pro neighbors likely. Uh moving to Indianapolis and Minnesota your team 42 point total. The
10:08Vikings are six and a half point favorites here. Jordan Mason is going to be back this week. Really, the only question I have for you is, are your
10:16Indianapolis Colts weak enough on defense that we can deploy Yeah. the Kyler Murray, Justin Jefferson stacks?
10:23>> Uh, yeah, we are. We We definitely are.
10:26And we're going to be down sauce this week, too. So, that certainly helps with Justin Jefferson as well. Presumably, he'll see a lot of Mooney Ward, but
10:34he'll be able to get reps going against.
10:37I I mean, I think it's going to be Cam Taylor Britt that we play as our second outside corner for the majority this
10:43week. So, yes, the the answer to are we weak enough for the Kyler Murray, Justin Jefferson stack should absolutely be yes. Uh our defense completely fell
10:53apart in the second half uh without Gardner. It's bad, frankly, even with Gardner. So, uh, I definitely think that Minnesota's going to find a way to have
11:03offensive success. Obviously, Aaron Jones completely off the board because his price does not reflect that Jordan Mason is back. Um, so it's it's probably
11:13just the Vikings passing game that I would have interest in. I I mean, I don't know. I don't I don't see a reason
11:19to play a Colt. Like, I I mean, I guess Keenan Allen at 4,800 is like a half decent play. He's probably going to be
11:28the hot road a lot against all the Flores blissing.
11:30>> Do you think Warren back is not going to play?
11:35>> I I have no idea. I think Tyler Warren will probably play. Um just it it seemed like he was kind of close to playing
11:40last week, so I assume he'll probably play. Uh yeah, that would hurt obviously. I don't I don't think that makes Keenan like totally unplayable,
11:47but he's definitely not like a actual jam play like he was last week. Uh nobody on the Colts is a jam play.
11:57Do you I mean do you even want to offer Joshua Downs Hopium? Like do do we even dare do we even dare go there?
12:03>> Have nothing left. Have nothing left.
12:05>> Yeah. I I uh on on my channel comped him to Deont and who loves Josh DS. He he said like he said unfortunately like
12:14Josh Downs to Deontay Johnson is fair.
12:17And that was like a just a a shot right through the heart as as someone who loves Josh DS but who also loved Deontay
12:26Johnson. It's just like that was like dagger. Ow. Um yeah, it's I mean like I I guess if you if you think that the
12:36Colts are going to show up and have pride, you can play Jonathan Taylor. Um like he's obviously going to get all the
12:42work. I I don't know. I'm I I'm interested to see like how much does this room like Shane Styen because there's like a world I guess where if
12:51they do really like him, they will try to rally around Shane Styen and protect his job. There's also like I think a
12:56more likely world in which the entire team just quits on the season and Wilson dies if we get blown out by like 21
13:03points. I mean, how much how much of the explanation here is that Daniel Jones played well last year and is just
13:10playing like so so bad this year?
13:14>> Uh, that's like over 50% of the explanation.
13:17>> I was going to say it's got to be a huge part of it. Yeah.
13:19>> Yeah. It's a massive part of the explanation. I mean, this game against Kyler Murray is like kind of a the world
13:25works in mysterious ways. Like it's it's perfect that this is the quarterback we're playing um the week after Chris Ballard is fired cuz
13:33>> right >> I mean I thought that was the fatal the fatal mistake of their 2026 off season that they learned the wrong lesson. They
13:40the lesson that they thought they learned was we found our quarterback.
13:43His name is Daniel Jones. And the lesson that they should have learned was if we can like have this offense with
13:52five great offensive linemen and Taylor and four above average uh pass catchers at every position. We can get strong
14:02quarterback results out of any passable quarterback. We just need to like kind of sign the cheapest one and then we can
14:11use that money to make sure the rest of our roster is really good. But instead they like gave a bunch of money to Alec
14:16Pierce who doesn't even play anymore.
14:19They gave a bunch of money to Daniel Jones. Like then that meant like they lost Michael Pitman and replaced him with old ass Keenan Allen. They uh lost
14:28multiple play players off the defense that they didn't replace cuz they didn't have the money to because he spent on Daniel Jones. like had had we been the
14:35Kyler Murray team, you know, I I obviously I don't think Kyler Murray would be like a phenomenal quarterback, but I think that we would have been able
14:43to basically just bring back the roster we had last year and and have more success with a healthy Kyler Murray than
14:49we have with like Daniel Jones off the Achilles looking horrible. So, um, anyways, is is what it is, but I I
14:57thought it was a really poorly conceived off season and and we are where we are and Chris Ballard is having a my tie
15:04somewhere.
15:06Keenan Allen, I think even if Warren is ruled in, I think you're right at and as we get through this slate, you guys will
15:12see how tight salary is going to be. We we've kind of reached that portion of the year where the thing that DraftKings
15:18does like they dynamically raise prices pretty well, but guys who suck very rarely see like Josh Downs is still 5600. I mean Josh Downs should be 4,100,
15:29right? Based off of uh of what he has done. Um and so because Keenan's price has not raised too much, I do think even
15:36Warren ruled in he will end up getting played a good bit. High total game. uh a 50 and a half point team total between
15:44the San Francisco 49ers traveling to play at the Atlanta Falcons. Chris McAffrey going to be absolutely giga mega quad like just the the amount of
15:53jamming that McAffrey and Gibbs are going to get this week because no one really projects that well is is kind of
15:58insane. Um CMC right now his base projection before anything gets altered too much is 26 points. I think he I think if you just played McAffrey in
16:07every lineup this week I I think that would be fine. I'm actually not that in to Bejon Robinson, even as leverage off
16:15of McCaffrey, even as leverage off of Gibbs, because I think the chances of them just losing by a lot as we saw last
16:24week and the offense kind of drifts away from him are are relatively high. And I just prefer like for all the arguing we
16:31did about Bejon versus Gibbs this offseason, it's like pretty clear that Gibbs is just he's script proof. He's It's just like he starts a game with 20
16:39and then it's just a matter of how much more he gets after that. The question I have for you is no Mike Evans, uh, no no
16:48Demarcus Robinson, no Debo Samuel, all these guys. Are we just thinking that KD is capable of handling 12 targets in a
16:57game? Or are you more philosophically aligned with me that if Christian Kirk is active for this game at $3,600 that Christian Kirk is going to be Richie
17:07James, Kendrick Bourne, uh, you know, the the the the reborning?
17:13>> My thoughts on Christian Kirk are 1,000% tied to his ownership, which I don't really know where we stand on that. on
17:21Thursday, October 22nd. Uh if I if he's not getting played, I'm very happy to do it. If if like the market's need for
17:32salary relief on this slate leads them to Christian Kirk being like even like 12% owned or something, I I have no
17:40interest in that. Like it's it's just so obvious to see how he could fail. I mean, he's he's just being promoted off
17:48the IR this week. it's plausible that he doesn't even play much and that they roll with Jordan Watkins and Brandon Cooks, you know, primarily as the two
17:56receivers ahead of him.
17:59Um, it's also highly plausible that he's just mega washed. He's coming off of a calf strain that cost him like eight
18:06weeks. Uh, and he is Christian Kirk who I think had like a point or had a 4.8 yards per target last year on the
18:14Houston Texans. So, >> but but 30 point fantasy football game in the postseason against the Texans last year.
18:22>> Yeah. Like that's why I see both sides of it. Like I I'm my base assumption of Christian Kirk is terrible. But yeah,
18:29like if I was to bet on any if I had to bet on a non-kiddle CMC pass catcher to carve out a reasonable role, it probably
18:35would be him. Like Brandon Cooks is more of a deep threat. He's not really target volume guy. He's also probably even more
18:42washed than Kirk is. Uh Jordan Watkins is like the most just a guy ever. He had a 3% target per throw run this week. Um
18:52I don't I don't even like who who even is on the rest of this team. It's like it's so dire. So I I think I think Kirk
18:58is a very fine play if people have negative assumptions about him. But if everyone is like no, this guy's a total
19:03jam. Like like that's like the I feel like that's like such a fundamental rule of DFS. like if people are excited to
19:09jam a wide receiver who has like extremely obvious paths to failure, you just don't participate in that. But um I'll be I'll be totally dependent on
19:18ownership um on what I do with Kirk. And then yeah, I mean McAffrey and KD are are both complete jams. I do think
19:26Bejon's a pretty big jam here. I I mean he had the bad week last week when he was like at 37% owned. Like I think that
19:33that was um probably bad um because this this offense has passed a failure. Like I preferred Ken Walker last week. I I
19:41played poor Ken Walker last week. But uh this like his ceiling remains as high as any running back. The floor overall like
19:49his median projection remains extremely high. He's he's I think the RV2 or is he RB3 now probably on the year behind
19:55Walker and Gibbs. Um and San Francisco has been pretty vulnerable to pass catching running backs. So I I do like McCaffrey. It's or I do like Bejon. It's
20:06very interesting like for most of the season, Bejon's had this type of price gap over McAffrey and Bejian's been way more owned and you know it's kind of
20:14like one one or two injuries happen.
20:16McCaffrey finally has a game where he's super involved in the past game. Now the ownership is completely flipped. Like I I understand the reasons for that. I I
20:23understand the target share has to go somewhere on San Francisco. I get the team totals and all that, but like it is
20:28possible that the inputs are kind of like overreacting slightly to one week that this ownership flip that's kind of out of step of what we've seen the
20:35entire season is a little bit overdramatic. I'm I'm definitely still openminded to playing Ban. I'm very into it.
20:41>> Yeah, I am I'm also very into playing KD. I think this really does project as a double tight end week as we I mean we
20:48are just getting to that point of the season where >> every double tight end week.
20:52>> Yeah. where there I think it's like a it's like a vestigial tale of DraftKings's original pricing algorithm that like tight ends are just treated
21:01differently in the pricing algorithm like their target shares and their ownerships. Like if Isaiah likely was a wide receiver, he'd be priced at, you
21:08know, 6,500 instead of 5,300 or whatever based off of the volume that he has gotten. So KD is just kind of
21:15artificially relatively cheap. And I guess I would also just like to know, I mean, Perie is just having an insane fantasy season. He is running a little
21:22bit. He is hyperefficient. He I I believe right now, depending on where you look, is either the MVP favorite or the second MVP favorite. Getting a dome
21:31game here. The stacks are sort of like hard to do because it's expensive with McAffrey. Um he doesn't really like I
21:38would not play Brandon Cooks. I would not play Jordan Watkins or or any of these guys really. Kirk would really be
21:44the only one I would be interested in.
21:45So I don't think he's going to pop too much in the Sims. If anything, you will probably get a fair amount of pennex at
21:505,300 just because the total for this game is so high in London and Bejon uh projected and and I mean Mr. I mean,
21:58Kyle Pittz, I think, is probably playable cuz he will never play in games they are leading, but I mean, it's kind
22:05of like uh you know who he's kind of like, he's kind of like Luther Burton where he doesn't play in a lot of these
22:12heavy personnel packages, but his targets per route run numbers are all pretty good because he plays in obvious passing situations and those are really
22:18the only times that he plays.
22:20>> Fair.
22:21>> Yeah, >> fair.
22:22>> Uh Cincinnati, Baltimore. So, I thought from this line, two and a half that it would be trending towards Lamar playing,
22:28but Lamar doesn't practice on Wednesday.
22:31Uh, our guy Crack Rockck had a tweet this morning suggesting that Lamar Jackson will not be playing, so I would expect some funkiness with the lines
22:40there. Uh, I mean, you know, Jamar Chase not going to get played on this slate at all. Um because Puka projects way too
22:48well, Gibbs projects way too well, Chase projects worse than Bejon and McAffrey who are sitting there at very similar prices. Flowers not going to get played.
22:57I think rightfully so. I mean, we've seen with Huntley in there, he Flowers is going to be quite good enough for you
23:03to just start him in like your reddraft stuff and you're just like, you know, I'll get my 15 points or whatever, but I
23:08don't think he has the same mega ceiling. And then um poor Mark Andrews, man. It just it left him. It left him
23:16and it ain't coming back. Yeah, >> it's over and that's all right.
23:19>> It's over and that's all right.
23:21>> Uh this game is entirely dependent on whether Lamar Jackson plays and we can't be sure.
23:26>> I'm going to guess I'm going to guess one more week probably there.
23:29>> Well, has have they updated the Vegas line? Earlier in the week, the Vegas line was suggesting that Lamar Jackson was definitely going to play.
23:36>> Um I mean, I'll go look. I'll go look right now. Um >> it's still Baltimore three and a half point favorites. I still think Lamar
23:43Jackson plays.
23:44>> Yeah. Okay. So, if he plays then like Chase Flowers, Lamar, uh I mean Chase, dude, if you're if you were brave enough
23:52to just like really plant your flag on Chase Brown right now, man, could you get paid because he did do this last
23:57year. He was actually worse than this last year. Um for a stretch like we we we got some Perine concern trolling last
24:04year. Uh you know, Jacobe Lane, there's another guy. So So Baitman injures his shoulder. Lane returns to a full-time role. If Lamar plays uh Lane, Lane then
24:15becomes the cheap play dujour. Far far more own than Christian Kurt for sure.
24:20>> Yeah. It's like I feel like I can't even like analyze this game because if it's if it's Huntley then I'm not playing any
24:26Ravens and like I'm I'm I'm probably not that interested in playing Bengals with the maybe with the potential exception of
24:36Chase Brown um on as like a but that might be too fancy. And then if if Lamar does play, I mean, now Flowers is a
24:45smash and Lane is the cheap chalk and Henry is a super fun play and now I'm probably way more inclined to play
24:54Higgins and Chase and Chase Brown um for the potential that they're like in comeback mode all game. I mean, it it
25:02really just hinges on Lamar to me. I if if if it's no Lamar, it's like contrarian play City. If Lamar plays,
25:09this game has the potential to be a total carnival. And I'm going to be very interested in playing a lot of it
25:15because I do still think the ownership is somewhat capped on like not on Lane, but on most the expensive guys because
25:21there's some more straightforward projections. Um, but like from like a game stacking perspective, I think super super super fun if Lamar plays. So, I I
25:29hope that we get that, but it's it's hard to speculate on right now.
25:33>> Yeah. uh Lamar plays and this slate actually becomes like significantly more interesting because it drifts a ton of ownership away from Green Bay Detroit.
25:41It's going to drift some ownership away from Macaffrey and and um you're just going to end up with a a much greater
25:48variety of of options. Like the way the slate is projecting right now, there really are not that many interesting running back options. There aren't
25:56really like I think if Lamar's back, Henry becomes playable. Like I wouldn't want to play Henry with Huntley just because I don't think he'll get enough
26:02raw rushes. But then this game becomes one that can potentially go, you know, kind of kind of way over and FL I mean
26:09Flowers at 6900 maybe becomes the best wide receiver play of the slate. Uh well I Golden obviously but then other than
26:17other than Golden um he becomes I think like stone stone chalk the Miami Dolphins and the New York Football Jets.
26:24So, sounds like we're not getting Bree back this week, but sounds like we are getting Adnai Mitchell back this week.
26:30Brillin um I mean I can you even call Brilen a gold star play? Like I think he's gonna he's going to be about
26:37>> he's going to be so owned. His price is not rising high enough. That's for sure.
26:41>> Yeah. Yeah. Um, so, so no Breece, Brilen. I mean, >> something you I've really learned in the in the sim era of DFS is like there's
26:50like not really an ownership that could make Brillin a bad play.
26:54>> No.
26:54>> Like outside of like accounting for like in-game injury, he would just be like an every lineup style guy here, I think.
27:02>> Yeah. He's going to get a million touches. He gets all of the running back goal line touches. He gets almost all
27:09the running back receiving. Incredible matchup. Yeah, he's like he's just a complete jam. Everyone's gonna show up with him and you want to show up with
27:16him, too.
27:17>> I I think um they they like in the last game, so two games ago, they kind of tried to make the Isaiah Davis thing
27:23work and then this last game they just gave up on I think Isaiah Davis played 11 snaps and and Brilan played 62 or
27:30something like that. Like it was like a totally it was like a Javon Williams Tyler Goodsonesque split in this last game. What is interesting on the Jets
27:39side is do we think they relent on their insane like I teams love to run the ball? Coaches love to run the ball. The
27:48Jets the Jets have a a Ben Johnsonesque passion for never allowing their wide receivers to get fantasy points and just and just running the ball. So Garrett
27:57Wilson, I mean obviously a great matchup against the Miami Dolphins, but like what's the volume like there? And then if AD Mitchell is back this week, does
28:05that mean that Omar Cooper Jr. at 4,100 and Amy Mitchell at 4500 just have to split eight targets between the two of
28:12them and whoever gets the fantasy points gets the fantasy points. Like that that is I wish that the the Dolphin or I wish
28:18that the Jets were a little bit more fun because if they were fun like if Frank Reich found joy in his heart they
28:25could score like 40 here and it could be like a total fantasy bonanza.
28:30Yeah, that is the thing with the Jets, like they they have the capacity to be fun from behind, but when if the run
28:37game is working, and I expect it to work decently well against Miami, if the run game is working, they like their
28:45favorite thing to do is just run it like 15 consecutive times. Like they just have these drives where it's like Brilen
28:51starts with a seven yard run, then he gets an eight yard run, and they're like, "Sweet. We're gonna run Brillin five consecutive times. Then we're gonna
28:58bring him off the field so we can run Isaiah Davis three times. Then we're gonna bring Isaiah Davis back off the
29:02field so then we can run Brilin five more times. Like and they do this with Bree and Brillin too. They had a drive
29:07like this against the Titans uh in week one where like both Bree and Brilin were cooking. They were just rotating them
29:14back and forth. They were just establishing the run and and it was like 13 minutes and I think they kicked a
29:21field goal. And that's that's like what the Jets want to do. They want to have 13-minute long drives with only run
29:27plays that end in field goals. That's kind of their their modus operandi.
29:33They're going to probably be able to do that this week. They're going to be able to accomplish their goal. They're going
29:37to be able to win this game 19- 10 with four field goals on four separate 11 minute drives with 10 carries a piece.
29:48Um split 73 between Brillin and Isaiah Davis. That's That's like probably in their cards.
29:56I I really if I'm going to play a Jet pass catcher, I mean Garrett's obviously fine.
30:01I've been so impressed by Omar Cooper. I really want to play him. Um and and it's like similar to what I said about the
30:07Christian Kirk thing, but with completely opposite reasons obviously. I just want to see what the ownership is.
30:12Like it's like I'm not going to put anything past the chess coaches. So, if everyone has just decided Omar Cooper is
30:18a superstar, it's like, yeah, I think Frank Reich is very capable of playing him a frustratingly low route rate, um,
30:26you know, uh, feeding 80 Mitchell, only passing the ball 22 times, all all that, uh, is very much on play. But like if
30:36the projections or whatever are are too bearish on Omar Cooper's route rate and they think AD Mitchell's gonna target Mog him and the route run's gonna be too
30:44low and like you can you can just play the potential chance that he's a superstar without having to eat a ton
30:50like I I'm pro I'm very into that. I mean I I would guess based on what he went for in FFPC this week including to
30:57me that people are pretty excited to play for him but we'll see.
31:01>> Yeah I I'm I am probably skipping on on these guys. It's really probably just Brillin. Um maybe you could do like an
31:08Olly Gordon 80 Mitchell correlation.
31:10Like Ollie Gordon gets loose for a 60-yard touchdown and then all of a sudden the Jets have to pass a little
31:14bit, but that's that would be only like large field stuff. Like I that I wouldn't get to that in the spy or any
31:20of these three contests or anything. Uh a game we can get through pretty quickly, the Cleveland Browns playing the [clears throat] Tennessee Titans. Um
31:27if you want to play Denzel Boston, fine.
31:29You want to play Carnell Tate, fine. Uh Carninal Tate has uh I believe four of his six games he has target shares above
31:3625%. His A dot is rising a little bit.
31:39Cam Ward is the worst. Deshun Watson is just as bad as Cam Ward. Casey Conpsion for as fun as he is and for as good as
31:48he looks, it's very very hard to generate, as Juell Robinson is learning, very very hard to generate a lot of fantasy numbers when your A dot's like
31:554.4 and you are not getting schemed red zone stuff. I think Judkins will probably be back in this game. If you
32:02wanted to play Judkins as like a total like I would be a very low degree of conviction for me. Maybe he scores a
32:08touchdown.
32:10If if Judkins and Samson are both active in this game, what what little interest I would have had in playing Judkins
32:16would be removed for me honestly because Judkins was getting a little bit of passing work before he injured his ankle and I think Samson would snatch all of
32:24that. [snorts] >> Yeah. I mean, I I'd refer to Dylan Samson by his true name, which is 2024 SEC offensive player of the year, Dylan
32:32Samson.
32:32>> Player of the year. [laughter] >> Um, but uh, yeah, the only player in this game that I have any interest to
32:39play against is Carnell Tate, and I don't have that much interest in playing Carninal Tate.
32:44>> Yeah, I I actually I'm actually I'm I'm Tate curious this week. like the ownerships are just going to be so
32:50condensed at wide receiver that any guy who can like theoretically get a 27 yard touchdown in a game uh in a lightly
32:58projectable way is pretty interesting to me and I don't think I don't think he will get all that owned and Conpion
33:04projections it's kind of interesting conceptions are projections are kind of biased towards Conpsion because his catch rate is very high his target rate
33:12has actually been been quite good but it's just like I don't know my my instinct from watching the games is that
33:19like it is going to require like a herculean yak play for Conpsion to ever hit 20 fantasy points. Like it would
33:28have [clears throat] to be like a Sports Center top 10 level play for Conpsion to generate a touchdown. Like it would be
33:34so so hard. And maybe that's maybe that is just like being um too biased towards what my eyes are seeing, but his role in
33:41the offense looks like the most difficult to access a ceiling. The floor is okay. Uh I think he had a game two
33:47weeks ago with one catch for seven yards. So maybe the floor is not even that good.
33:53>> I am inclined to agree with you.
33:55>> Uh all right, Tampa Bay Carolina Baker Mayfield did return to practice. We will have him here. Hubard 6700 again just I
34:03mean he's basically like he's basically got Christian McAffy's role with like slight like he he is the I mean Jir Gibbs' role uh on the Carolina Panthers
34:13like we had him on the the ship chasing pickum last week and it was like man he's really doing it two and a half
34:19yards at a time. He's they're just really giving this dude the ball. Uh Bucky Irving very very interesting here.
34:26$6,100 on DraftKings. 61-9 snap split last week with Kenneth Gainwell. I I think Buccaneers gave Kenneth Gainwell a lot of money, but
34:36man, they have not gotten very much return on that investment. He he's had very very little to offer the the the the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. I I I
34:47assume I mean you are you're my lead Bucky correspondent. I assume you're viewing this as a good spot for him.
34:53>> Oh, I love this spot for him. I mean, he's coming off an 81% snap rate game.
34:58Some Some are saying Kenny Gainwell was one of the worst picks on the board.
35:01>> They are. I I'm hearing it. Yeah.
35:04>> Yeah. Um Well, I'll come back around. Uh yeah, expect Baker Mayfield to be back in the lineup this week and that's huge for
35:11Bucky because it's just going to it's just going to reduce the pressure uh that opposing defenses put on the run game because like he just does not have
35:19a lot of space to operate in the condensed Jaylen Daniels offense. And then Jaylen Daniels is completely allergic to checking down. Like watching
35:27these Bucks games, every single time Bucky gets out in a route, it's like he's open. Jaylen Daniels is like, "No, I'm going to scramble around. I'm going
35:34to scramble around. I'm going to throw in complete Booker." Um Baker will take those checks. So I'm I'm expecting like based on Buckyy's route rate
35:43and his general like four or five targets a week. like add an extra two, three checkdowns on top of kind of the couple
35:53of screens they throw him intentionally.
35:55Um, but he's only been getting the first three stuff with Jaylen Daniels cuz he just does not check down. So, uh, I like
36:00Bucky quite a bit in this spot. Um, I like Chuba, of course, uh, as well on the other side. Uh, I think that the
36:09pricing gap between them is pretty, uh, effective in terms of delineating the difference in projection between them.
36:16So, yeah, I'm I'm I'm in on the spot.
36:18This is all assuming Baker plays. If it's Jaylen Daniels again, I probably have only interest in the Carolina side.
36:24Um, but with Baker back, I have interest in in a lot of this game.
36:31I I'm I'm probably a little bit less interested in the game overall just because it feels like Carolina is a team
36:38that likes to put a strangle hold on games if possible. Like they're they're fine getting in the mud. Dude, what what
36:44happened to Chris Godwin Jr.? I I mean, he got he got with Mark Andrews.
36:50>> Yeah. H like I I was just kind of going through stuff like like reddraft rankings and stuff for this week and I
36:56was like I actually had no idea how because I I wasn't drafting a ton of Chris Godma Jr. so it's not affecting me
37:02in terms of like setting my weekly lineups or anything and he never projects that well so I don't really have to think about him. But I was like
37:09man this guy has really been one of the worst players uh in in the National Football League.
37:16his best his best game this year is three for 46 as like a just a total full-time player. I I mean I it's just
37:24it's completely it's completely wild. Um I'm I'm >> This team has nothing on the outside. I I know a lot of people love him. Some
37:33even say he was thriving. I'm He had he saw 29 targets um in three games with Jaylen Daniels.
37:41Do you know how many yards he converted those 29 targets into? probably like seven >> 98 98 yards on 29 targets. Like so like
37:51I just I I I mean I understand a lot of that's on the quarterback and I get that earning volume is a skill, but like I I
37:59really do feel just from an eye test perspective that I has been earning all this volume based largely on the fact
38:06that like they have Kad and tight end who had the most Kotten line of all time this week which was 41 routes, one
38:12target. Um, and then they he doesn't check down to the running backs ever.
38:17So, it's like they they only throw to the receivers. The other side is Chris Godwin. He just mentioned is turbowashed. So, it's like, yeah, like I
38:24can earn a lot of targets, but there's just no juice on this team. And and I is the best option on it, but I don't think
38:31he's a great option. And I think part of the reason that this offense was kind of bad, even with Baker Mayfield, is they
38:36just don't have a lot of gas on this offense outside of Bucky Irving. Um, so I I don't know. I think I think I like a
38:45totally fine play with Baker because I think the target chair is gonna project really well. Um, but I don't think he's
38:50a superstar and I think Buckyy's a I would be I'd be totally into Bucky. I'd be fine playing Baker honestly. And then
38:57if Baker plays like the the Carolina passing game is way more fun because they're just more likely to fight back and so that'd be positive for McMillan
39:04and Coker. But you know they're taking away the fun pricing on McMillan and Coker real fast. 7100 and 6100 is a
39:11tough ask. I think it's fine.
39:14>> I think it's fine, but it's a tough pill to swallow.
39:17>> Yeah, I I agree. I like Coker I'm I would be into playing and I think he will get owned this week, but it is it's
39:24like man guy is guy's expensive.
39:29>> I mean I think I just have a hard time wide receiver too.
39:32>> Yeah. Like I mean maybe his price is wide receiver one.
39:36I I mean I I think I just have a hard time like adjusting expectations fast enough on players that I like. It's like
39:42it's actually easier for me to be like stupid Isaiah likely. I hate this guy.
39:46Oh, he's like god now. All right, fine.
39:49I I've adjusted. I've changed my priors.
39:51But like when you like a guy and then he hits like I I had posted my dynasty ratings update yesterday and someone
39:59immediately was like, "Why is Jaylen Coker still so low?" And I was like, >> "Yeah, >> no, you're right. Like I have him way
40:04too low." and like immediately moved him up. Like I I it's like yeah, he actually should be a $6,100 wide receiver. He
40:10should probably be higher than that. He should probably be right next to T.
40:12Higgins. Um it's just like hard for me, I think, to like wrap my head around Jaylen Coker's ascent into just being a
40:20top 20 wide receiver for the rest of the season, but he he totally has earned that.
40:27>> Uh all right, let's move on now to Denver, Arizona. And I regret to inform you. I I I actually insanely regret to
40:37inform you that I will be playing Jaylen Waddle with my own money this week.
40:42>> Uh how how is it possible that Bo Nicks is this bad?
40:47>> How how how is it possible? I I like of of I mean this is a stat that's going around that everyone knows but of the
40:55since they started tracking air yards he is 701 out of 701 in terms of overall average depth of target this season this
41:03cannot possibly persevere there if if Bo Nicks loses this game at Arizona looking like [ __ ] again like I don't even know
41:13who the Broncos backup quarterback is.
41:15It's probably like Teddy Bridgewwater. I I have no idea. But like it it can't it can't continue. This this has to be a
41:22Jaylen Waddle 12 target game.
41:26>> Like I I mean a lot of his like peripheral metrics that aren't like yards or points are fine.
41:36It's just like Bo Nicks has been such a disaster uh that it's really killed this whole offense. I will be playing Jaylen Waddle
41:44here.
41:46I don't feel good about it.
41:48The real question is, >> no, I won't. I won't.
41:53>> Okay. [laughter] >> I will not play JK Dobbins. No, no, >> no. I was asking you to play Bo Knicks.
41:59>> Oh, no. I mean, Peter will. Peter, that was the first thing Peter said on the SW cast was, "Oh, I spot for Bicks." I
42:06think I think if I'm playing Waddle, I'm just gonna fully go for it because if to play like for Waddle to smash,
42:17Nicks has to do something. He has to throw the ball effectively to Jaylen Wadd. And then
42:24like I I I think that he's so cheap and the matchup is really strong. What's What's their team total? I haven't
42:33looked. I imagine it's kind of decent this week if I had to guess.
42:37>> Uh game total of game total of 44 and a half.
42:40>> 44. So then it's going to be >> So then it's it's going to be 24 and a half team total.
42:46>> Uh well here I can I can pull >> 24 and a half and 19 and a half adds up to 44.
42:51>> Yeah, there you go. 20 24 and a half 39% base rush rate. Uh the inputs for Jaylen model 25% target share 25% market share
42:59touchdowns 64% catch rate leading up to 14 PPR points.
43:05>> I'm just saying we got a quarterback >> with a 24 and a half team total at 5K.
43:12Like that's that's something.
43:16>> It's something. And theoretically theoretically Bicks will run. I mean that is that is one of the things >> they will theoretically run. Yeah. I I
43:25don't know that that I buy that the ankle is a major issue. But yeah, I don't play I'm not playing Dobbins.
43:30Jonah Coleman's coming off IR this week.
43:32I don't think that like there's going to be a huge role for Jonah Coleman, but I think he will take like just enough to
43:39like dock the JK Dobbins projection by a couple of points because his work's coming, I think, more from Dobbins than it is from Harvey. Dobbins has been
43:47awful. Just awful all year. Uh, so yeah, Nicks Waddle. I'm doing one Nick Waddle lineup. It won't be a successful lineup,
43:56but I'm doing it.
43:59>> I, you know, I mean, look, I I probably spent my money on worse things over time, but it's hard to think of one.
44:05>> I spent my money on way worse things.
44:06Jaylen Wadd every other freaking year of his career.
44:08>> Yeah, Jaylen. Jaylen Wadd. So, I don't think Jeremiah I don't think Jeremiah Love is going to play.
44:15that I would have been comfortable deploying $5,000 Tyler Algier except they just gave Jeremiah Love's role to Bam Knight. So now they're both totally
44:23unplayable.
44:24>> Who's who's not only better than Tyler Algier, but is better than Jeremiah Love >> apparently. Apparently better than than Yeah. Which then become I mean this is
44:31like a a reddraft thing, but this then becomes a huge problem for Jeremiah Love when he returns from this ankle injury
44:36because Bam Knight has played so well that the coaches aren't going to be like, "Okay, well you don't get to play
44:40anymore at all." So he gets like 10 ceremonial snaps per game that directly come from Jeremiah Love and then it becomes the the absolute worst backfield
44:49in the history of the National Football League. It becomes Packersque at that point. I >> I think it'll get resolved pretty quick,
44:56but I I definitely could see a world where the first week back for Jeremiah was like, well, like we have to have the
45:01Son of the Night drive.
45:03>> Have to. Yeah. So, on the the Arizona side of the game, I I have to admit I did get swept up in in Michael Wilson
45:11mania. Um, it turns out he's still very much Michael Wilson, which I find I find very surprising, but it turns out it's
45:18just as easy for him to go 4 for 40 as it is for him to go, you know, 11 for 117, um, or whatever. Now, if you wanted
45:27to totally say the last two weeks are kind of an aberration, Arizona's gonna have to chuck here. Whatever. Whatever.
45:33I I could I could see playing Michael Wilson as like a legit like two to five percent owned guy. I nothing about this
45:40spot like screams to me uh it's a Michael Wilson jams and he actually probably would draw the PS2 coverage here, right? Because
45:48>> is PS2 going to play?
45:50>> I mean, he's not on the IR, so I I mean, I'm not grinding Broncos practice reports for their defensive backs, but
45:57like he's not on the IR, so he he will be eligible to play at some point.
46:01>> Okay. I I will be grinding the Broncos practice sports for this game because I I do want to play Michael Wilson. Like
46:05the XFP profile is still really strong.
46:07I can't imagine he's on the Bone model.
46:10Um >> limited limited in practice Wednesday.
46:12>> Oh, limited when Oh, so he is going to play.
46:16That matters to me. Um my my my desire to play Michael Wilson will be influenced by Pastor Tain's final game status. I I am worried about
46:28Pastor Tan. Uh if Pastor Dan does play, that makes I mean McBride's gotten to the price point where no one's even going to play him
46:36anymore. So I'm kind of interested in that. Um that that'd be it. It'd be it's it's mostly just Wadd is the guy I want
46:44to play here.
46:45>> Yeah. Yeah. I I I don't know. I don't know how we ended up here with $5,500 Jaylen Waddle being a plug your nose
46:51play, but uh there we are. We are we are plugging our narrows. All right. Game of the week. The Green Bay Packers
46:58traveling to play in the dome against the Detroit Lions. 53 and a half point total, higher than every other game of
47:04the slate by three. Gibbs Infinity. I I'll say this, if Gibbs does actually show up as 18%, I I mean I I'll take
47:12some money out. Uh I I'll I'll get a second mortgage on my house to play more. There's there's no chance. Uh St.
47:19Brown then becomes like an insanely good leverage play. There actually is an interesting wrinkle here where Love ends
47:28up so much more owned than Jared Goff because he is $800 less expensive and because the Love Golden thing just builds itself. Watson is also, you know,
47:38a better play >> correspondingly than Jameson Williams.
47:42So, Love Golden or Love Watson with the the the Lions bring back ends up like so much more owned than the um than the
47:50Goff St. Brown stuff that like go St.
47:54Brown Gibbs Golden is like a really unique way to play this game. I think >> I think you've nailed it on the head. Um
48:02yeah, there's there's a gazillion different iterations of this stack.
48:07All of them have a ton of upside.
48:11Just very obviously the most common one will be love golden one of Gibbs or St.
48:17Brown. That's just going to be the easiest way to do it. you get your superstar Lion, you get the cheaper quarterback, you get the cheaper of his
48:24two receivers who projects just as well, if not better. Um, and then like Leaport is a great play, but there's a lot of
48:32other kind of tight ends and you know, J Mo is is up and down. Like that's just going to be the comfy way to do it is
48:39love Colon, one of Gibbs or St. Brown.
48:41Um, so I think that like unlike the Cardinals Lions game where kind of like
48:48everyone was megaowned and there were no like kind of ways to cuz it was like it was like a bunch of megaowned
48:58good projecting pieces and then like horribly projecting pieces outside of that. This game I do think at least has some ways to not get off of ownership
49:07cuz every all the main participants are going to be owned, but to at least change your the ownership of your stack
49:14from like 30 to 40% owned guys to like 15 to 20% owned guys and just kind of reversing it and playing like the
49:26slightly more uncomfortably priced players who still have really high ceilings. Probably the move. So like you know you go Goff Jam Mo Leaporta Watson
49:37or or Gooff JO Laa Jacobs or or even you do play one of Gibbs in Almond Rob but then you uh but you do it with Goff and
49:45you mix in one of J Mo or Leaporta and you use like Jacobs or Craft or Watson instead of Golden like it's going to be
49:52at least slightly different and then you just kind of figure out ways to get different elsewhere. So, I I think this
49:56game um I I find it less paralyzing than I did the Arizona Detroit one a couple weeks ago. Um I think that there's just
50:04kind of so many good options where both teams are like relatively concentrated, but there are still four obviously
50:15playable skill players on both sides plus the two quarterbacks. like, you know, it's it's still tough because everyone's going to play this game so
50:22much that every single combination of sack is going to be played and you're probably going to have to hit the precisely correct one if you're going to
50:29win this way. Like, and so it's just kind of like up to you to decide, I guess, you know, what's the what's the
50:36easier path to success? another game beating this game or you picking the right combination of players from a game where everyone is going to be trying to pick
50:47the right combination of players. I I I hope like you said earlier, I hope Lamar plays because that makes this game uh
50:54still probably the most owned on the slate, but like it it at least gives you an alternative game that has just as
51:00high of a ceiling.
51:03>> Yeah. Yeah. That's really the only way that you end up without Matthew Golden 45%, the the combo ownership of the
51:10quarterbacks being 35%, Gibbs being 40%, St. Brown being 20. I mean, you you always get the residual of Jameson Williams ownership in these huge spots
51:18where it's like should be 8%, his projected ownership is 12% and he actually ends up owned 18%. Leaporta and Craft will kind of get lost between the
51:27cracks. People will play Isaac Tesla. I guess I mean I guess we should talk about Josh Jacobs because is there a
51:34chance that Lafleur gets back to playing Lafleur ball where I mean we know he wants to run the ball. All these Shanny
51:42guys want to run the ball all the all the West like they they would prefer to do this. You obviously can't do that
51:48when Marshawn Lloyd, Caleb Johnson and Pier Strong and Chris Brooks are your running backs. They get Jacobs back this week. Are they going to be are they
51:55going to try and be like negative PE in in this game?
52:00I mean, they've only they've already been neutral PE all year. Largely, what's driven their pass rate is that their defense has been pretty bad and
52:06their running game is so bad that their expected pass rate is necessarily high because they keep ending up in second and 11 every time they call a run play.
52:13So, if if Jacobs gets you to second and seven more often, then maybe they can they call that second down run that's
52:22been staring at Matt Lafur like the Green Goblin Bask all year. I I I'm of the camp that they are going to be more
52:28runheavy, but I don't think it will be as dramatic as people think because >> probably not in this game.
52:33>> Not in this game. I also just don't think Josh Shake is that good. He's old.
52:37He was inefficient last year. He's coming off of a long break from even getting to practice with the team. Their offensive line is still quite poor. Like
52:46Josh Jacobs is a way better running back than Lloyd and Strong and Caleb Johnson, all these goofs. I I think he will
52:52obviously help their run game. I I just don't think it's like Josh Jacobs comes back and now their run game is awesome.
52:57I think they're still going to have run game issues. If I was to set the line at Josh Jacobs yards per carry this season,
53:04I would set it like 4.1. Like I don't think he's going to be some amazing revelation for their offense. So, I
53:11still think they're going to have this a lot of the same systemic issues that force them to pass despite being kind of
53:17a neutral PRE team anyway. Um, so I'm not that worried that Matthew Gold and Christian Watson are just going to fall
53:22off a cliff. But that's also, you know, some some element of self- serving bias because I have really enjoyed this Matthew Golden season and I wanted to
53:31continue.
53:32>> Yeah. Yeah. Golden. Golden to me I I mean there's not a projected ownership they could create that would get me to
53:38abandon my special boy.
53:40>> Well, guess what am I going to do? I'm going to spend my Sunday rooting against Matthew Golden? Like no, I'm not going
53:45to do that. He's in like all my FFPC teams and he's in all my basketball teams. So, he may as well be on my DFS
53:51teams.
53:52>> Sure. Wish my co-managers were more woke to Matthew Golden in the FFPC. That much that much I I can >> But like, how did we not get more of
53:59him? Cuz we're two votes. I don't understand how this happened.
54:03>> Well, Josh DS was always available. So, so sometimes you were able to be you were able to be swayed. Mia Lemon was
54:11available, so that was where Pat's vote would go.
54:14>> Oh, yeah. Sure. Glad we were drafting Mai Lemon over Matthew Golden. That worked out well.
54:20>> You know, and then Peter, I mean, Peter famously only had one opinion, so he never really cared.
54:24>> He doesn't have player type.
54:26>> Yeah.
54:26>> Yeah. All right.
54:27>> We should we should have been able to get him. We We don't have him on nearly enough of our combined teams. I mean, I
54:32I have him on like basically pro probably like on 60% of my non- ship chasing teams, >> right?
54:40>> But like I wish that we had them. I mean, our ship chasing teams are doing great this year, but like imagine how
54:44well they could be doing. Like, I think every team is three and three or better, but every team could be so much better
54:50if we had Matthew Golden on it.
54:51>> It's actually true. Yeah, our portfolio is actually kind of sick this year. We don't have any dead teams yet, which is
54:56>> is every team is still alive, but like, man, if every team had Matthew Golden, >> God, that'd be good.
55:04>> You hate to see it. Uh, all right, man.
55:06Well, we got to find an answer to this.
55:08the Rams game against the Las Vegas Raiders. Is there a secondary beneficiary in the Rams offense with no Devonte Adams? I guess the the easy
55:19answer is that it just continues to be Tyler Higgby and Kairen Williams. You had the great stat about the backfield share for the Rams last week, which
55:27actually resulted in a way that was very funny because it did not benefit Kairen Williams. It benefited Blake Cor with his first ever. This was my This was my
55:34call and we were on Shiftcast and you ended up not swapping, but you were like, "If you were to swap onto
55:38something, what should you swap on to?"
55:40I was like, "The best thing you could swap on to if you're in a bad spot is Blake Cororm because if he scores, it's
55:45coming right out of Kairen's pocket.
55:46It's coming right out of Puka's pocket."
55:48Um, I I did that actually on one team and I I got a I got a minash on the spy lineup from a terrible early slate
55:58because I I pulled Puka and Kirn out insert a little bit of Blake Cororum.
56:03Um, so yeah, that's that was fun. But anyways, in terms of the terms of this game, really fun game. Probably if Lamar
56:11does not play, I think it's the second most fun game. Um, I'll start this at a really weird place. What do you think
56:18the expected ownership is going to be on Kannata Mumfield this week?
56:22>> Uh really low. Yeah. No one because >> what's what's his price? Is it 3K?
56:27>> Uh 3,200. My guess >> my guess is that >> playing it. Let's go.
56:33>> I don't think anyone any [clears throat] projection provider, which is where all this stuff floats from. I don't think anyone will be so
56:42confident in their reading of the situation to give him, you know, an 18 19% target share. I think they'll give, you know, a little bit to Parkinson, a
56:52little bit more, you know, month give Mumfield to I don't know here. What's our what's what's the base target share that Ron the Sims has? Uh 11% there. Um,
57:02you give a little bit to Daniels, a little bit to Atwell, a little bit to Whittington, a little bit extra to
57:07Parkinson, a little bit to Davis Allen, you know, one play to Max Claire, you give a bump to Kirin, you give a bump to
57:13Corm, and then all of a sudden then all of a sudden you run out, you basically run out of >> Yeah.
57:19>> All that makes sense. That's cool.
57:20That's fine. Uh, if Christian Kirk is more like Mumfield, that's going to be a big no for me. I'm playing Mumfield over
57:27Kirk.
57:27>> He will be. He will be. And I'm actually with you because the thing that I will not go with is I will not go with the
57:36Parkinson stuff. I I think we have we've got six games.
57:38>> Parkinson ran way fewer routes than Higgby. That was like total varian.
57:42>> Exly. They they play different like the way the Rams offense works is Parkinson and Davis Allen play a different role
57:50than Terren Ferguson and Tyler Higgby.
57:52It's why it's why Higgby was completely irrelevant last year, you know, in in in all of their 13 personnel stuff. like
57:58Higgby did not factor into this at all and signed like the the a two-year $8 million like partially guaranteed contract, but I mean because they
58:09planned on having Terence Ferguson have this huge role in the offense. Um and Parkinson and Davis Allen are kind of like it's like a Mayor Bowers thing
58:17honestly. It really is where where they're they're functionally not even related um to one another.
58:22>> He's in the T for a role.
58:24>> Yes. Um, >> Mumfield, >> I will play I will play both Higgby and Mayor probably just on the basis of like
58:30I'm going to want to spend up a lot in different places. I'm going to need to find a way to spend down and and those
58:36two seem like >> half decent tight ends to play in the 3K range. I I think I'll have a lot of like
58:43really discount mini correlations in this game where I'll have like Mumfield and Mayor or like uh you know something like that. Uh the the the Trey Tucker
58:54hitting last week was super tilting because I did play a Kurt Cousins Trey Tucker uh lineup and everything else in the lineup sucked. And so now it's like
59:02I have to wait four more weeks for Trey Tucker's price to come back down and for him to have another 25point game and
59:09hope that I can play it in a lineup that actually does something. Um I I think that yeah, like obviously Puka, Kairen totally fine plays. I think
59:18Cororum is always a really interesting play in DFS because you're you're going to have so much ownership on Puka and Kirn and Cororm is both like quite
59:26capable of getting 15 16 points at a really small price but the way that he scores it is just so detrimental to both
59:32Puka and Kairen and Stafford. I mean, he caught the receiving touchdown this time, but usually detrimental to Stafford, but I think he's he's just
59:40always a guy that is a way better play than is captured by like his specific projection whenever the rest of his Rams
59:47skill players are really owned. Like specifically as a late swap option for bad lineups, but even if you wanted to do it as like a just a building a lineup
59:55that intends to fade the rest of the Rams, I think it's viable.
59:58>> Yeah. Yeah, I'm with you. I'm with you there. I I mean I think Higgby as like Stone Chalk like I don't even care. He
60:05just is like floor of floor of eight. Uh he hasn't even he hasn't even scored yet, right? Or he scored he did. No, he
60:12did score. He scored in the one game that literally no person on earth could have benefited from because it was the
60:17game that TF Ferg injured his ankle in.
60:20Um is is the only game that he has scored in. So last week, Jacob, huge shipper in the show that we built,
60:26finished uh 1,098th in the DK Millie out of 158,000 entrance. Chuck, Walker, Hubard, Alave,
60:34Vele, Jeremy, likely Luther Burden III, and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers defense. We have to try and uh revisit that success
60:46here this week. Um so I will I will give you the first pick. Let's uh let's go.
60:52Let's do it. Um, all right. I will I'm trying to figure out who the heck my gold star play is going to be this week.
61:00I feel like I don't have enough information on some of the games, but I'll I'll uh I'll make it Bucky Irving.
61:07I I'll make it Bucky Irving. I'll I'll play the hits. I'll be loyal to my man.
61:11>> I think I think that's a I think that is a very good gold star play. So, I am going to give us Jamir Gibbs just
61:19because I think all the best lineups this week are going to feature one mister Jir Gibbs. Um, >> yeah, I I'm
61:28>> good play. Good play.
61:29>> I just think you I just think you have to play him. I think he's too good. I think this is
61:33>> peak CMC David Johnson, Levon Bell stuff. I just don't I just don't think you fade him.
61:38>> All right. Uh, I will go with Sam Leaporta. Uh, we'll build out the rest of this game. I I think Jonathan Ganon
61:45defense is like all about don't give up the big play. Make them throw it underneath. I don't think this is a J Mo
61:50week. I hope I'm wrong because I have decent exposure to him, but I don't think it's a JMO week. I don't think we
61:55can really afford Gibbs and St. Brown.
61:57So, I'll pick Leaporta as the second member of what I'm kind of anticipating will be alliance double stack here.
62:03>> All right, we'll go Leaporta and then I will put Matthew Golden in this lineup as our as our correlated piece there. So
62:12you might think like, oh this is like so chalky. This actually by playing Bucky and by playing Leaporta, we have already
62:19gotten um a smidgen weird like already we are kind of outside because the the combo ownership of Gibbs mayor or Gibbs
62:28Higgby is going to be huge because that's the obvious way to to save salary.
62:33>> All right. Well, I will save salary. Um, we've we've leveraged we we've decided the Higgby is not going to be a part of
62:40this lineup or I guess we haven't yet.
62:41We could play him in the flex, but I'm I'm now kind of deciding the Higgby won't be a part of this lineup cuz I
62:45will play Canada Mumfield.
62:48>> Wow. Wow. Canada. So, you actually did save a bunch of salary which is uh keeping me from having to jam in Jacobe
62:56Lane. So, I will do the thing that we talked about earlier in the show and we'll show you guys how difficult this
63:00is. I'm going to slot Jared Goff in here instead of of love. I actually after starting to build this lineup I think
63:08we're going to get to like >> we might get we might get to like 8% Jared Goff because it is like you that
63:15$800 really does matter.
63:18>> It really matters. All right, let's let's put in a defense here. See how much play we're working with.
63:23>> Um >> slot in the Arizona Cardinals. Easiest easiest choice I've ever made putting the Arizona Cardinals at home against Bon in this lineup.
63:33>> Okay. Uh, I'm I'll go ahead and put in Brillin Allen. We'll try and make this a three running back lineup and
63:41then see what that leaves us at our third wide receiver slot.
63:45>> Um, >> oh yikes. We might have to take Brayan Allen out of the lineup, but we'll >> No, no, we're not we're not taking we're
63:51not taking Brayan Allen out because I very much want to reproduce how good our lineup was last week. So, we are
63:58actually going to do the thing that makes that that everyone else is going to do. We're gonna put Jordan Love in
64:04this team. And at wide receiver, we are going to take my >> very reluctant gold star play. We are going to put $5,500 [laughter]
64:14Jaylen Wadd in here. So, Jordan Love, Bucky Irving, Jir Gibbs, Matthew Golden, Canada Mumfield, Jaylen Wadd, Sam Leaporta, Brailen Allen, and the Arizona
64:23Cardinals defense. Uh, as always, if we win $1 million, I will give one of you commenters $10,000 American dollars. And uh, honestly, dude, this team is this
64:34team is good. It is not going to sim It'll sim okay. It won't sim too great because Mumfield doesn't project that
64:43well. But other than that, these are all very strong projecting options.
64:49It's a nice team. You love to You love to see it.
64:52>> Fun team.
64:53>> All right. uh tell the people what they can get at thinking about thinking and uh we will we will be on our way.
65:00>> Yeah, different kind of week this week.
65:01I I went off the beaten path largely because I mean how often does your team fire their GM? So I wrote a
65:09uh a retrospective stepbystep uh analysis of the Chris Ballard era uh this week on Think About Thinking. So for anyone who's like a total sicko can
65:21enjoy that. And then >> it was a good read. I enjoyed it.
65:24>> Thank you. I appreciate that. Uh and then to to make up for, you know, kind of spending a lot of my typical
65:29Hitchhiker's Guide time watching that and kind of not having a chance to do a lot of my normal midweek content, uh I
65:37kind of put everything together into one piece. I I I called it the take purge, which was just stealing ideas from other
65:42podcasts. Um but I just kind of wrote up like where I stand on some of the key questions for every NFL team at the
65:49mid-season point. It's probably all you'll have for me this week, but I think you have like 27,000 words combined between those to read. And then
65:57uh I'll I'll probably be spending most of the rest of my week uh taking in some concerts. I got geese tonight. I got
66:02Phoebe Brides on Saturday. Uh and then I'll be locked back in for football on Sunday.
66:08>> All right, lock it in. We will see you guys back on Sunday. Make sure to like the video, subscribe to the channel, and
66:13uh good luck this

More episodes from Davis Mattek

6